Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PWSvsVUSEETF Comparison
PACER WEALTHSHIELD ETF (PWS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (VUSE) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. In contrast, VUSE's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. PWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.5% for VUSE. PWS is down -1.05% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. VUSE performs worse with -1.65% YTD performance, and -$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWS and VUSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PWS vs VUSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWS VUSE | -2.35%-0.31% | -0.85%-0.53% | -1.05%-1.65% | +6.30%+13.93% | +26.83%+56.34% | +9.78%+60.71% |
| Flows | PWS VUSE | -+$124K | --$15M | --$15M | +$9M-$10M | -$435K-$93M | -$24M-$44M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWS VUSE | +11.35%+12.30% | +11.50%+17.58% | +11.78%+14.67% | +12.11%+17.57% |
| Max drawdown | PWS VUSE | -5.19%-5.32% | -6.44%-12.64% | -10.48%-18.84% | -25.07%-21.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | PWS VUSE | 54d64d | 119d37d | 368d134d | 1432d521d |
PWS | VUSE | |
Last sale 3/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.19 | $63.87 |
| Previous close 03/17/2026 | $32.09 | $64.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PWS | VUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PWS | VUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.19 | $63.87 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | -1.58% |
| AuM | $30.56 M | $618.21 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.5% |
PWS | VUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Vident |
| Benchmark | Pacer Wealth Shield Index | Vident U.S. Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 359 | 118 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2017 | January 21, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PWS and VUSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 17, 2026, PWS is down -1.05% year-to-date (YTD), while VUSE has lost -1.65%. That puts PWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWS or VUSE?
Year-to-date, the PWS ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$15M for VUSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWS or VUSE?
Over the past year, PWS had a volatility of 11.5%, while VUSE experienced 17.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWS or VUSE?
As of March 17, 2026, PWS holds $30.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while VUSE manages $618.21 M.
What sectors do the PWS and VUSE ETFs invest in?
PWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, VUSE focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PWS ETF and VUSE ETF?
PWS top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, NVIDIA and TESLA. VUSE holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, WALMART INC and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: PWS or VUSE?
PWS holds 396 securities with 37.63% of its assets in the top 15. VUSE has 122 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.63%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
