Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PWSvsMNZLETF Comparison
PACER WEALTHSHIELD ETF (PWS) and Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. PWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. In contrast, MNZL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. PWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.4% for MNZL. PWS is down -1.05% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. MNZL performs better with 0.05% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWS and MNZL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PWS vs MNZL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWS MNZL | -2.35%-3.38% | -0.85%+1.18% | -1.05%+0.05% | +6.30%n/a | +26.83%n/a | +9.78%n/a |
| Flows | PWS MNZL | -+$2M | -+$4M | -+$3M | +$9M- | -$435K- | -$24M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWS MNZL | +11.35%+13.38% | +11.50%n/a | +11.78%n/a | +12.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PWS MNZL | -5.19%-6.07% | -6.44%n/a | -10.48%n/a | -25.07%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PWS MNZL | 54d34d | 119dn/a | 368dn/a | 1432dn/a |
PWS | MNZL | |
Last sale 3/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.19 | $51.16 |
| Previous close 03/17/2026 | $32.09 | $51.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PWS | MNZL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PWS | MNZL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.19 | $51.16 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | -0.80% |
| AuM | $30.56 M | $4.64 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.4% |
PWS | MNZL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Manzil |
| Benchmark | Pacer Wealth Shield Index | Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Custom Index |
| N° of holdings | 359 | 405 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2017 | November 19, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PWS and MNZL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 17, 2026, PWS is down -1.05% year-to-date (YTD), while MNZL has returned 0.05%. That puts MNZL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWS or MNZL?
Year-to-date, the PWS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$3M for MNZL.
Which ETF is bigger: PWS or MNZL?
As of March 17, 2026, PWS holds $30.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while MNZL manages $4.64 M.
What sectors do the PWS and MNZL ETFs invest in?
PWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, MNZL focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PWS ETF and MNZL ETF?
PWS top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, NVIDIA and TESLA. MNZL holds in its top three: APPLE, BROADCOM LIMITED and TESLA.
Which ETF is more diversified: PWS or MNZL?
PWS holds 396 securities with 37.63% of its assets in the top 15. MNZL has 445 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.62%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
