Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PWSvsFCTEETF Comparison
PACER WEALTHSHIELD ETF (PWS) and SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. PWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Consumer Discretionary and Information Technology. In contrast, FCTE's top sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. PWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.89% for FCTE. PWS is down -1.05% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FCTE performs better with 2.76% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWS and FCTE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PWS vs FCTE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWS FCTE | -2.35%-3.49% | -0.85%+2.58% | -1.05%+2.76% | +6.30%-0.18% | +26.83%n/a | +9.78%n/a |
| Flows | PWS FCTE | -+$1M | --$7M | -+$2M | +$9M-$197M | -$435K- | -$24M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWS FCTE | +11.35%+16.96% | +11.50%+20.23% | +11.78%n/a | +12.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PWS FCTE | -5.19%-7.54% | -6.44%-13.39% | -10.48%n/a | -25.07%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PWS FCTE | 54d48d | 119d45d | 368dn/a | 1432dn/a |
PWS | FCTE | |
Last sale 3/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.19 | $25.46 |
| Previous close 03/17/2026 | $32.09 | $25.60 |
| Consolidated volume 03/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PWS | FCTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PWS | FCTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.19 | $25.46 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $30.56 M | $219.41 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.89% |
PWS | FCTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | 3Fourteen & SMI Advisory Services |
| Benchmark | Pacer Wealth Shield Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 359 | 20 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2017 | July 2, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PWS and FCTE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 17, 2026, PWS is down -1.05% year-to-date (YTD), while FCTE has returned 2.76%. That puts FCTE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWS or FCTE?
Year-to-date, the PWS ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$2M for FCTE.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWS or FCTE?
Over the past year, PWS had a volatility of 11.5%, while FCTE experienced 20.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWS or FCTE?
As of March 17, 2026, PWS holds $30.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while FCTE manages $219.41 M.
What sectors do the PWS and FCTE ETFs invest in?
PWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FCTE focuses on Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PWS ETF and FCTE ETF?
PWS top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, NVIDIA and TESLA. FCTE holds in its top three: LEIDOS HOLDINGS INC, TRACTOR SUPPLY and CARDINAL HEALTH.
Which ETF is more diversified: PWS or FCTE?
PWS holds 396 securities with 37.63% of its assets in the top 15. FCTE has 20 securities and a top 15 weight of 75.51%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.