PWBvsNULGETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and NuShares ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. PWB's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, NULG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. PWB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.26% for NULG. PWB is up 27.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$577M in YTD flows. NULG performs worse with 15.87% YTD performance, and +$341M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWB and NULG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PWB vs NULG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWB NULG | +0.24%-0.79% | +9.65%+8.39% | +27.20%+15.87% | +35.81%+15.97% | +131.68%+82.31% | +112.48%+80.35% |
| Flows | PWB NULG | +$127M-$11M | +$315M-$149M | +$577M+$341M | +$680M+$525M | +$806M+$546M | +$695M+$874M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWB NULG | +33.05%+21.78% | +23.55%+18.73% | +20.98%+19.62% | +22.06%+22.03% |
| Max drawdown | PWB NULG | -13.90%-6.84% | -13.90%-14.45% | -22.20%-22.48% | -31.51%-36.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | PWB NULG | 35d34d | 35d170d | 101d187d | 757d801d |
Trading data
PWB | NULG | |
Last sale 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM | $160.53 | $117.09 |
| Previous close 08/04/2026 | $161.62 | $116.41 |
| Consolidated volume 08/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PWB | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/5/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PWB | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $160.53 | $117.09 |
| 1D performance | -0.67% | +0.58% |
| AuM | $2.44 B | $2.69 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
PWB | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Nuveen |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 69 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | December 13, 2016 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PWB
USA
97.25%
Other
2.75%
NULG
USA
96.79%
Other
3.21%
Sectors
PWB
Technology
55.3%
Industrials
19.05%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.29%
Finance
8.2%
Other
7.16%
NULG
Technology
54%
Industrials
11.8%
Healthcare
8.99%
Other
25.21%
Advertisement
Diversification
PWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.96%
NULG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.4%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
PWB
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.56%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.18%
Lam Research Corp.
3.89%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.63%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.43%
Visa, Inc.
3.41%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.35%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
3.14%
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.97%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.90%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
2.74%
NULG
NVIDIA Corp.
14.22%
Broadcom Inc.
5.90%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.31%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.09%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.67%
Lam Research Corp.
3.36%
Visa, Inc.
2.84%
Caterpillar, Inc.
2.83%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.42%
Western Digital Corp.
2.24%
GE Vernova, Inc.
2.24%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
2.11%
Netflix, Inc.
1.78%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.72%
Fortinet, Inc.
1.66%
Frequently asked questions about PWB and NULG
How have the PWB and NULG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 4, 2026, PWB is up 27.2% year-to-date (YTD), while NULG has returned 15.87%. That puts PWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWB or NULG?
Year-to-date, the PWB ETF saw +$577M in flows, compared to +$341M for NULG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWB or NULG?
Over the past year, PWB had a volatility of 23.55%, while NULG experienced 18.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWB or NULG?
As of August 4, 2026, PWB holds $2.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while NULG manages $2.69 B.
What sectors do the PWB and NULG ETFs invest in?
PWB leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, NULG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PWB ETF and NULG ETF?
PWB top holdings include Applied Materials, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc. and Lam Research Corp.. NULG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc. and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PWB or NULG?
PWB holds 50 securities with 49.96% of its assets in the top 15. NULG has 69 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.4%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
