PWBvsNULGETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and NuShares ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF (NULG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. PWB's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, NULG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. PWB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.26% for NULG. PWB is up 23.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$765M in YTD flows. NULG performs worse with 13.09% YTD performance, and +$679M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWB and NULG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PWB vs NULG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWB NULG | -0.95%-5.74% | -5.54%-2.85% | +23.84%+13.09% | +26.40%+12.37% | +124.40%+79.30% | +109.00%+71.26% |
| Flows | PWB NULG | +$109M+$326M | +$354M+$332M | +$765M+$679M | +$841M+$856M | +$991M+$878M | +$894M+$1.19B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWB NULG | +29.34%+17.95% | +24.26%+19.11% | +21.21%+19.66% | +22.21%+22.12% |
| Max drawdown | PWB NULG | -13.90%-7.62% | -13.90%-14.45% | -22.20%-22.48% | -31.51%-36.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | PWB NULG | 80d35d | 80d170d | 101d187d | 757d801d |
Trading data
PWB | NULG | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $157.29 | $111.31 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $155.26 | $110.59 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PWB | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PWB | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $157.29 | $111.31 |
| 1D performance | +1.31% | +0.65% |
| AuM | $2.56 B | $2.95 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.26% |
Characteristics
PWB | NULG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Nuveen |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | MSCI TIAA ESG USA Large-Cap Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 69 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | December 13, 2016 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PWB
USA
95.48%
Other
4.52%
NULG
USA
94.67%
Other
5.33%
Sectors
PWB
Technology
52.13%
Industrials
18.59%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.66%
Finance
10.1%
Other
7.53%
NULG
Technology
52.22%
Industrials
11.01%
Healthcare
9.36%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.71%
Other
19.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
PWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.86%
NULG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.57%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PWB
Mastercard, Inc.
4.16%
Visa, Inc.
4.12%
Apple, Inc.
4.00%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
3.54%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.50%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.48%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
3.28%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.22%
Broadcom Inc.
3.20%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.16%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.14%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.11%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.11%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.01%
Lam Research Corp.
2.85%
NULG
NVIDIA Corp.
14.91%
Broadcom Inc.
6.36%
Eli Lilly & Co.
4.10%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.69%
Visa, Inc.
3.17%
Applied Materials, Inc.
2.69%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
2.46%
Lam Research Corp.
2.38%
Caterpillar, Inc.
2.27%
Western Digital Corp.
2.00%
GE Vernova, Inc.
1.97%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.96%
Booking Holdings, Inc.
1.95%
Netflix, Inc.
1.86%
Fortinet, Inc.
1.83%
Frequently asked questions about PWB and NULG
How have the PWB and NULG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, PWB is up 23.84% year-to-date (YTD), while NULG has returned 13.09%. That puts PWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWB or NULG?
Year-to-date, the PWB ETF saw +$765M in flows, compared to +$679M for NULG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWB or NULG?
Over the past year, PWB had a volatility of 24.26%, while NULG experienced 19.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWB or NULG?
As of September 18, 2026, PWB holds $2.56 B in assets under management (AUM), while NULG manages $2.95 B.
What sectors do the PWB and NULG ETFs invest in?
PWB leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, NULG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PWB ETF and NULG ETF?
PWB top holdings include Mastercard, Inc., Visa, Inc. and Apple, Inc.. NULG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc. and Eli Lilly & Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: PWB or NULG?
PWB holds 50 securities with 50.86% of its assets in the top 15. NULG has 69 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.57%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
