PWBvsILCGETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. PWB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.04% for ILCG. PWB is up 26.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$585M in YTD flows. ILCG performs worse with 12.68% YTD performance, and -$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWB and ILCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PWB vs ILCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/05/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWB ILCG | -0.57%+1.15% | +7.39%+5.07% | +26.16%+12.68% | +35.98%+18.02% | +127.04%+90.07% | +109.40%+77.52% |
| Flows | PWB ILCG | +$135M+$17M | +$322M+$143M | +$585M-$14M | +$688M-$64M | +$815M-$22M | +$695M-$222M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWB ILCG | +33.03%+23.24% | +23.55%+18.94% | +20.98%+20.28% | +22.06%+22.55% |
| Max drawdown | PWB ILCG | -13.90%-10.40% | -13.90%-15.55% | -22.20%-23.24% | -31.51%-35.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | PWB ILCG | 36d64d | 36d169d | 101d151d | 757d807d |
Trading data
PWB | ILCG | |
Last sale 8/6/2026 at 6:23 PM | $160.25 | $116.88 |
| Previous close 08/05/2026 | $160.53 | $116.97 |
| Consolidated volume 08/05/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PWB | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/6/2026 at 6:23 PM
Live
Closed
PWB | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $160.25 | $116.88 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | -0.08% |
| AuM | $2.43 B | $3.26 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
PWB | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 324 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PWB
USA
97.25%
Other
2.75%
ILCG
USA
98.26%
Other
1.74%
Sectors
PWB
Technology
55.3%
Industrials
19.05%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.29%
Finance
8.2%
Other
7.16%
ILCG
Technology
61.62%
Industrials
10.48%
Other
27.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
PWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.96%
ILCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
PWB
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.56%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.18%
Lam Research Corp.
3.89%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.63%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.43%
Visa, Inc.
3.41%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.35%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
3.14%
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.97%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.90%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
2.74%
ILCG
NVIDIA Corp.
14.27%
Apple, Inc.
6.46%
Broadcom Inc.
5.35%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.62%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.92%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.88%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
2.88%
Tesla, Inc.
2.23%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.17%
Microsoft Corp.
2.07%
Intel Corp.
1.85%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.74%
Lam Research Corp.
1.65%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.36%
Frequently asked questions about PWB and ILCG
How have the PWB and ILCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 5, 2026, PWB is up 26.16% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCG has returned 12.68%. That puts PWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWB or ILCG?
Year-to-date, the PWB ETF saw +$585M in flows, compared to -$14M for ILCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWB or ILCG?
Over the past year, PWB had a volatility of 23.55%, while ILCG experienced 18.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWB or ILCG?
As of August 5, 2026, PWB holds $2.43 B in assets under management (AUM), while ILCG manages $3.26 B.
What sectors do the PWB and ILCG ETFs invest in?
PWB leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, ILCG focuses on Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PWB ETF and ILCG ETF?
PWB top holdings include Applied Materials, Inc., Micron Technology, Inc. and Lam Research Corp.. ILCG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PWB or ILCG?
PWB holds 50 securities with 49.96% of its assets in the top 15. ILCG has 327 securities and a top 15 weight of 55.34%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
