PWBvsILCGETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. PWB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.04% for ILCG. PWB is up 14.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$868M in YTD flows. ILCG performs worse with 6.41% YTD performance, and -$83M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWB and ILCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PWB vs ILCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWB ILCG | -12.73%-7.83% | -10.17%-5.66% | +14.26%+6.41% | +13.33%+4.88% | +106.43%+82.21% | +80.58%+56.58% |
| Flows | PWB ILCG | +$32M-$18M | +$292M-$69M | +$868M-$83M | +$874M-$188M | +$1.10B-$58M | +$1.00B-$279M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWB ILCG | +23.01%+17.12% | +25.39%+19.67% | +21.64%+20.35% | +22.46%+22.68% |
| Max drawdown | PWB ILCG | -13.37%-9.73% | -13.90%-13.37% | -22.20%-23.24% | -31.51%-35.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | PWB ILCG | 29d29d | 127d155d | 101d151d | 757d807d |
Trading data
PWB | ILCG | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $134.15 | $103.48 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $145.28 | $110.32 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PWB | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
PWB | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $134.15 | $103.48 |
| 1D performance | -7.66% | -6.20% |
| AuM | $2.46 B | $3.01 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
PWB | ILCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 322 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PWB
USA
95.57%
Other
4.43%
ILCG
USA
97.76%
Other
2.24%
Sectors
PWB
Technology
55.97%
Industrials
19.59%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.94%
Other
14.49%
ILCG
Technology
63.43%
Industrials
9.04%
Other
27.52%
Advertisement
Diversification
PWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.13%
ILCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.45%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
PWB
Intel Corp.
4.26%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.08%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.03%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.63%
Apple, Inc.
3.51%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.45%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.26%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.25%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.15%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
3.09%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.09%
Visa, Inc.
3.08%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.05%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.03%
ILCG
NVIDIA Corp.
16.16%
Apple, Inc.
7.38%
Broadcom Inc.
4.98%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.10%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.48%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.03%
Microsoft Corp.
2.85%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.81%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.80%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.00%
Tesla, Inc.
1.88%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.76%
Intel Corp.
1.70%
Palantir Technologies, Inc.
1.26%
Lam Research Corp.
1.25%
Frequently asked questions about PWB and ILCG
How have the PWB and ILCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, PWB is up 14.26% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCG has returned 6.41%. That puts PWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWB or ILCG?
Year-to-date, the PWB ETF saw +$868M in flows, compared to -$83M for ILCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWB or ILCG?
Over the past year, PWB had a volatility of 25.39%, while ILCG experienced 19.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWB or ILCG?
As of November 4, 2026, PWB holds $2.46 B in assets under management (AUM), while ILCG manages $3.01 B.
What sectors do the PWB and ILCG ETFs invest in?
PWB leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, ILCG focuses on Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PWB ETF and ILCG ETF?
PWB top holdings include Intel Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. ILCG holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PWB or ILCG?
PWB holds 50 securities with 51.13% of its assets in the top 15. ILCG has 325 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.45%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
