PUSHvsCGSMETF Comparison
VS
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) and Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. PUSH's top 2 sector exposures are Municipal and Non-Corporate. In contrast, CGSM's top sector exposures are Municipal. PUSH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.25% for CGSM. PUSH is up 1.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$131M in YTD flows. CGSM performs worse with 0.64% YTD performance, and +$723M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PUSH and CGSM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PUSH vs CGSM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PUSH CGSM | -0.11%-0.02% | -0.12%-0.75% | +1.56%+0.64% | +2.20%+1.21% | n/a+13.41% | n/an/a |
| Flows | PUSH CGSM | +$40M+$68M | +$74M+$128M | +$131M+$723M | +$134M+$808M | -+$1.63B | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PUSH CGSM | +1.12%+2.20% | +0.70%+1.67% | n/a+1.95% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PUSH CGSM | -1.19%-2.33% | -1.19%-2.33% | n/a-2.33% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PUSH CGSM | 46d52d | 46d52d | n/a52d | n/an/a |
Trading data
PUSH | CGSM | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 3:43 PM | $50.06 | $25.95 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $50.17 | $25.98 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 3:43 PM
Live
Closed
PUSH | CGSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $50.06 | $25.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.12% |
| AuM | $176.07 M | $1.65 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
PUSH | CGSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | PGIM | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 77 | 235 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 28, 2024 | September 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PUSH
USA
29.54%
Other
70.46%
CGSM
USA
30.46%
Other
69.54%
Sectors
PUSH
Municipal
24.99%
Other
75.01%
CGSM
Municipal
30.46%
Other
69.54%
Advertisement
Diversification
PUSH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.18%
CGSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.02%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PUSH
PGIM Core Government Money Market Fund
4.55%
US04062PCC32
1.41%
Michigan Finance Authority, 5% 1dec2037, USD (2017A)
1.38%
US92162PAM77
1.33%
Main Street Natural Gas Inc., 4% 1jul2052, USD (2021A)
1.13%
US880443JF46
1.07%
Southeast Energy Authority, 5.25% 1jan2054, USD (2023A)
1.04%
US781741AV51
1.02%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 4% 1feb2050, USD
1.02%
Chandler Industrial Development Authority, 4% 1jun2049, USD (2019)
0.95%
US358388TR77
0.90%
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp., 5.5% 1jan2054, USD (2023A)
0.90%
US57584XEF42
0.83%
US686430GE38
0.83%
US652276DB90
0.80%
CGSM
US650028E821
1.12%
US574193XS28
1.02%
US34153QZG45
1.01%
US83703FLR19
0.99%
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 5% 1feb2028, USD (2026A)
0.83%
US373385QZ98
0.66%
PEFA Inc., 5% 1sep2049, USD (2019)
0.63%
US57421CLT98
0.63%
Puerto Rico, FRN 1nov2043, USD
0.62%
Virginia College Building Authority, 5% 1feb2032, USD
0.62%
US48542TBS87
0.61%
US74440DFN93
0.59%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1jun2031, USD (2026)
0.58%
US254773BN34
0.57%
New York Municipal Water Finance Authority, FRN 15jun2053, USD (2023)
0.54%
Frequently asked questions about PUSH and CGSM
How have the PUSH and CGSM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, PUSH is up 1.56% year-to-date (YTD), while CGSM has returned 0.64%. That puts PUSH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PUSH or CGSM?
Year-to-date, the PUSH ETF saw +$131M in flows, compared to +$723M for CGSM.
Which ETF is more volatile: PUSH or CGSM?
Over the past year, PUSH had a volatility of 0.7%, while CGSM experienced 1.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: PUSH or CGSM?
As of October 15, 2026, PUSH holds $176.07 M in assets under management (AUM), while CGSM manages $1.65 B.
What sectors do the PUSH and CGSM ETFs invest in?
PUSH leans toward sectors like Municipal. Meanwhile, CGSM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the PUSH ETF and CGSM ETF?
PUSH top holdings include PGIM Core Government Money Market Fund, US04062PCC32 and Michigan Finance Authority, 5% 1dec2037, USD (2017A). CGSM holds in its top three: US650028E821, US574193XS28 and US34153QZG45.
Which ETF is more diversified: PUSH or CGSM?
PUSH holds 322 securities with 19.18% of its assets in the top 15. CGSM has 1032 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.02%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PUSH & CGSM
A Close Look at Capital Group's 5 New Active ETFs Listed on NYSE ARCA
October 26, 2023
CGSM
Advertisement
Advertisement
