PULSvsJMUBETF Comparison
VS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) belongs to the Money Market Bonds segment. JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. PULS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, JMUB's top sector exposures are Municipal and Sovereign. PULS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%, versus 0.18% for JMUB. PULS is up 2.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5.77B in YTD flows. JMUB performs worse with -1.18% YTD performance, and +$2.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PULS and JMUB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PULS vs JMUB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PULS JMUB | +0.30%-2.08% | +0.98%-2.45% | +2.77%-1.18% | +4.22%+0.16% | +16.87%+9.62% | +23.48%+2.62% |
| Flows | PULS JMUB | +$656M+$139M | +$2.01B+$882M | +$5.77B+$2.23B | +$6.66B+$5.04B | +$13.77B+$8.06B | +$17.20B+$8.62B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PULS JMUB | +0.30%+2.85% | +0.29%+2.27% | +0.32%+3.21% | +0.39%+3.16% |
| Max drawdown | PULS JMUB | -0.02%-3.21% | -0.04%-3.21% | -0.32%-4.05% | -0.51%-11.93% |
| Max drawdown duration | PULS JMUB | 4d67d | 7d67d | 20d270d | 313d1046d |
Trading data
PULS | JMUB | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 6:17 PM | $49.59 | |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $49.57 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 6:17 PM
Live
Closed
PULS | JMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.59 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.03% | – |
| AuM | $19.08 B | $8.43 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.18% |
Characteristics
PULS | JMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | PGIM | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 339 | 604 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 5, 2018 | October 29, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PULS
USA
31.92%
Other
68.08%
JMUB
USA
40.58%
Other
59.42%
Sectors
PULS
Finance
17%
Industrials
7.13%
Other
75.87%
JMUB
Municipal
39.16%
Other
60.84%
Advertisement
Diversification
PULS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.98%
JMUB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PULS
US01527MH308
0.74%
US46115MAD83
0.70%
Alimentation Couche-Tard, 0% 6oct2022, USD (41D, ECP)
0.68%
PGIM Core Government Money Market Fund
0.63%
US43475GHE35
0.57%
USA, Bills 0% 22sep2026, USD (119D)
0.55%
US44855PAA66
0.51%
US29251VH411
0.51%
ABN AMRO, 4.718% 22jan2027, USD (US031)
0.51%
Federation des caisses Desjardins du Quebec, FRN 27jan2027, USD
0.46%
US81762TK865
0.45%
US75611NHA37
0.43%
US17291YRU37
0.42%
US29670KH308
0.41%
US76076GH480
0.41%
JMUB
USA, Bills 0% 11aug2026, USD (119D)
1.42%
US25477GZQ18
0.74%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026)
0.72%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5% 1mar2036, USD (2026B)
0.64%
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, 5% 15aug2065, USD (2026B-3)
0.64%
US796242WD34
0.62%
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, 5% 1jun2055, USD (2020B-2)
0.60%
California Community Choice Financing Authority, 5.25% 1feb2036, USD (2026C)
0.58%
US64972JP283
0.52%
US20775DYT35
0.50%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 4.329% 1jul2040, USD
0.44%
US917393CY40
0.44%
US542691KA76
0.42%
US09182TEN37
0.40%
US13013JHG40
0.40%
Frequently asked questions about PULS and JMUB
How have the PULS and JMUB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, PULS is up 2.77% year-to-date (YTD), while JMUB has lost -1.18%. That puts PULS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PULS or JMUB?
Year-to-date, the PULS ETF saw +$5.77B in flows, compared to +$2.23B for JMUB.
Which ETF is more volatile: PULS or JMUB?
Over the past year, PULS had a volatility of 0.29%, while JMUB experienced 2.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: PULS or JMUB?
As of September 10, 2026, PULS holds $19.08 B in assets under management (AUM), while JMUB manages $8.43 B.
What sectors do the PULS and JMUB ETFs invest in?
PULS leans toward sectors like Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, JMUB focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the PULS ETF and JMUB ETF?
PULS top holdings include US01527MH308, US46115MAD83 and Alimentation Couche-Tard, 0% 6oct2022, USD (41D, ECP). JMUB holds in its top three: USA, Bills 0% 11aug2026, USD (119D), US25477GZQ18 and Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1dec2034, USD (2026).
Which ETF is more diversified: PULS or JMUB?
PULS holds 983 securities with 7.98% of its assets in the top 15. JMUB has 2070 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.09%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PULS & JMUB
Advertisement
