Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PTNQvsQYLGETF Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PTNQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.35% for QYLG. PTNQ is down -1.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$36M in YTD flows. QYLG performs better with 0.41% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTNQ and QYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PTNQ vs QYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTNQ QYLG | -0.65%-0.03% | -3.24%+0.12% | -1.22%+0.41% | +10.18%+24.35% | +64.40%+84.07% | +57.79%+72.03% |
| Flows | PTNQ QYLG | -$12M-$264K | -$24M+$20M | -$36M+$8M | -$154M+$38M | +$123M+$62M | +$43M+$137M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTNQ QYLG | +16.06%+12.73% | +14.63%+19.26% | +12.40%+15.92% | +12.57%+18.63% |
| Max drawdown | PTNQ QYLG | -5.67%-4.33% | -9.84%-13.82% | -14.19%-20.90% | -18.23%-30.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | PTNQ QYLG | 41d41d | 120d45d | 210d155d | 550d718d |
PTNQ | QYLG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $77.75 | $27.06 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $77.67 | $27.02 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PTNQ | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PTNQ | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $77.75 | $27.06 |
| 1D performance | +0.10% | +0.15% |
| AuM | $1.23 B | $137.41 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.35% |
PTNQ | QYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index | CBOE Nasdaq-100 Half BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 11, 2015 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PTNQ and QYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PTNQ is down -1.22% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLG has returned 0.41%. That puts QYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTNQ or QYLG?
Year-to-date, the PTNQ ETF saw -$36M in flows, compared to +$8M for QYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTNQ or QYLG?
Over the past year, PTNQ had a volatility of 14.63%, while QYLG experienced 19.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTNQ or QYLG?
As of March 10, 2026, PTNQ holds $1.23 B in assets under management (AUM), while QYLG manages $137.41 M.
What sectors do the PTNQ and QYLG ETFs invest in?
PTNQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PTNQ ETF and QYLG ETF?
PTNQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PTNQ or QYLG?
PTNQ holds 100 securities with 58.45% of its assets in the top 15. QYLG has 99 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.14%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
