Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PTMCvsGRPMETF Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) belongs to the Alternatives segment. Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PTMC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, GRPM's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. PTMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.35% for GRPM. PTMC is up 3.91% year-to-date (YTD) with -$11M in YTD flows. GRPM performs worse with -0.49% YTD performance, and -$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTMC and GRPM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PTMC vs GRPM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTMC GRPM | -4.49%-4.38% | +2.26%-2.94% | +3.91%-0.49% | +9.15%+15.80% | +22.95%+44.43% | +13.31%+42.20% |
| Flows | PTMC GRPM | -$2M-$26M | -$19M-$22M | -$11M-$20M | -$54M-$114M | -$66M+$217M | -$82M+$304M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTMC GRPM | +15.23%+15.74% | +12.53%+23.43% | +14.24%+20.30% | +12.77%+20.98% |
| Max drawdown | PTMC GRPM | -5.42%-5.02% | -6.07%-16.57% | -15.12%-27.87% | -16.92%-27.87% |
| Max drawdown duration | PTMC GRPM | 16d29d | 83d91d | 470d421d | 862d421d |
PTMC | GRPM | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.97 | $118.52 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $37.07 | $119.12 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PTMC | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PTMC | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.97 | $118.52 |
| 1D performance | -0.28% | -0.50% |
| AuM | $385.74 M | $476.02 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.35% |
PTMC | GRPM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index | S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index |
| N° of holdings | 382 | 57 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 11, 2015 | December 3, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PTMC and GRPM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PTMC is up 3.91% year-to-date (YTD), while GRPM has lost -0.49%. That puts PTMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTMC or GRPM?
Year-to-date, the PTMC ETF saw -$11M in flows, compared to -$20M for GRPM.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTMC or GRPM?
Over the past year, PTMC had a volatility of 12.53%, while GRPM experienced 23.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTMC or GRPM?
As of March 10, 2026, PTMC holds $385.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while GRPM manages $476.02 M.
What sectors do the PTMC and GRPM ETFs invest in?
PTMC leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, GRPM focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PTMC ETF and GRPM ETF?
PTMC top holdings include CIENA, US19247G1076 and LUMENTUM HOLDINGS. GRPM holds in its top three: LANTHEUS HOLDINGS, RENAISSANCERE and APPFOLIO INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: PTMC or GRPM?
PTMC holds 399 securities with 10.84% of its assets in the top 15. GRPM has 60 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.68%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
