Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PTLCvsXYLGETF Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) belongs to the Alternatives segment. Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PTLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.35% for XYLG. PTLC is down -2.41% year-to-date (YTD) with -$101M in YTD flows. XYLG performs better with -1.1% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTLC and XYLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PTLC vs XYLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTLC XYLG | -2.27%-1.38% | -2.12%-0.38% | -2.41%-1.10% | +7.64%+16.79% | +56.47%+59.52% | +65.38%+61.28% |
| Flows | PTLC XYLG | -$30M-$276K | -$149M+$4M | -$101M+$2M | -$404M+$1M | +$190M+$8M | +$184M+$64M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTLC XYLG | +11.71%+9.63% | +11.37%+15.78% | +12.27%+12.21% | +11.85%+13.94% |
| Max drawdown | PTLC XYLG | -4.30%-3.04% | -9.00%-12.29% | -15.08%-17.16% | -15.08%-21.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | PTLC XYLG | 44d15d | 121d48d | 247d154d | 247d736d |
PTLC | XYLG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.94 | $26.75 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.26 | $26.91 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PTLC | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PTLC | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.94 | $26.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $3.15 B | $63.29 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.35% |
PTLC | XYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index | CBOE S&P 500 Half BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 479 | 479 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 11, 2015 | June 21, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PTLC and XYLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PTLC is down -2.41% year-to-date (YTD), while XYLG has lost -1.1%. That puts XYLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTLC or XYLG?
Year-to-date, the PTLC ETF saw -$101M in flows, compared to +$2M for XYLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTLC or XYLG?
Over the past year, PTLC had a volatility of 11.37%, while XYLG experienced 15.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTLC or XYLG?
As of March 12, 2026, PTLC holds $3.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while XYLG manages $63.29 M.
What sectors do the PTLC and XYLG ETFs invest in?
PTLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, XYLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PTLC ETF and XYLG ETF?
PTLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. XYLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PTLC or XYLG?
PTLC holds 502 securities with 44.11% of its assets in the top 15. XYLG has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
