Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PTLCvsBWVTFETF Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) belongs to the Alternatives segment. iPath CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index ETN (BWVTF) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PTLC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.75% for BWVTF. PTLC is down -2.41% year-to-date (YTD) with -$101M in YTD flows. BWVTF performs better with 0.1% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTLC and BWVTF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PTLC vs BWVTF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTLC BWVTF | -2.27%-0.56% | -2.12%+1.36% | -2.41%+0.10% | +7.64%+13.87% | +56.47%+45.20% | +65.38%+49.00% |
| Flows | PTLC BWVTF | -$30M- | -$149M- | -$101M- | -$404M-$715K | +$190M-$900K | +$184M-$1M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTLC BWVTF | +11.71%+8.08% | +11.37%+15.18% | +12.27%+11.14% | +11.85%+12.23% |
| Max drawdown | PTLC BWVTF | -4.30%-2.38% | -9.00%-11.76% | -15.08%-16.79% | -15.08%-19.88% |
| Max drawdown duration | PTLC BWVTF | 44d14d | 121d91d | 247d240d | 247d686d |
PTLC | BWVTF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.94 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $54.26 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PTLC | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PTLC | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.94 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | – |
| AuM | $3.15 B | $1.54 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.75% |
PTLC | BWVTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Barclays |
| Benchmark | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index | CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index |
| N° of holdings | 479 | 479 |
| Asset class | - | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 11, 2015 | May 22, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PTLC and BWVTF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PTLC is down -2.41% year-to-date (YTD), while BWVTF has returned 0.1%. That puts BWVTF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTLC or BWVTF?
Year-to-date, the PTLC ETF saw -$101M in flows, compared to - for BWVTF.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTLC or BWVTF?
Over the past year, PTLC had a volatility of 11.37%, while BWVTF experienced 15.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTLC or BWVTF?
As of March 12, 2026, PTLC holds $3.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while BWVTF manages $1.54 M.
What sectors do the PTLC and BWVTF ETFs invest in?
PTLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BWVTF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PTLC ETF and BWVTF ETF?
PTLC top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BWVTF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PTLC or BWVTF?
PTLC holds 502 securities with 44.11% of its assets in the top 15. BWVTF has 503 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.54%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
