Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PTHvsLFSCETF Comparison
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) belongs to the US Health Care segment. F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) is part of the Life Sciences segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Health Care. PTH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.72%, versus 0.79% for LFSC. PTH is down -0.94% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. LFSC performs worse with -3.7% YTD performance, and +$7M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTH and LFSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PTH vs LFSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTH LFSC | +0.87%-2.09% | -2.99%-10.37% | -0.94%-3.70% | +31.67%+60.97% | +40.70%n/a | -4.17%n/a |
| Flows | PTH LFSC | -+$7M | -$2M+$8M | -$2M+$7M | -$15M+$18M | -$92M- | -$495M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTH LFSC | +21.14%+22.01% | +24.53%+28.67% | +24.42%n/a | +25.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PTH LFSC | -7.58%-13.02% | -16.12%-19.03% | -29.24%n/a | -50.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PTH LFSC | 86d90d | 183d70d | 271dn/a | 1650dn/a |
PTH | LFSC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.86 | $35.01 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $49.20 | $35.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PTH | LFSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PTH | LFSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.86 | $35.01 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -0.57% |
| AuM | $122.13 M | $95.79 M |
| E/R | 0.72% | 0.79% |
PTH | LFSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Emerald Group |
| Benchmark | Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 34 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 12, 2006 | October 31, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PTH and LFSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PTH is down -0.94% year-to-date (YTD), while LFSC has lost -3.7%. That puts PTH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTH or LFSC?
Year-to-date, the PTH ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$7M for LFSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTH or LFSC?
Over the past year, PTH had a volatility of 24.53%, while LFSC experienced 28.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTH or LFSC?
As of March 10, 2026, PTH holds $122.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while LFSC manages $95.79 M.
What sectors do the PTH and LFSC ETFs invest in?
PTH leans toward sectors like Health Care. Meanwhile, LFSC focuses on Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PTH ETF and LFSC ETF?
PTH top holdings include US74006W2070, GUARDANT HEALTH INC and ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD. LFSC holds in its top three: COGENT BIOSCIENCES, LIVANOVA and GUARDANT HEALTH INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: PTH or LFSC?
PTH holds 58 securities with 50.37% of its assets in the top 15. LFSC has 42 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.94%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
