PSQOvsINTMETF Comparison
VS
Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) belongs to the US Aggregate Bonds segment. Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. PSQO's top 3 sector exposures are Sovereign, Industrials and Utilities. In contrast, INTM's top sector exposures are Municipal. PSQO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.35% for INTM. PSQO is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD) with +$173M in YTD flows. INTM performs worse with -1.79% YTD performance, and +$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSQO and INTM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PSQO vs INTM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSQO INTM | +0.48%-0.78% | +1.29%-1.92% | +3.01%-1.79% | +5.08%+2.12% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | PSQO INTM | +$17M+$1M | +$36M+$2M | +$173M+$12M | +$209M+$88M | -- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSQO INTM | +0.49%+2.25% | +0.67%+2.18% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PSQO INTM | -0.08%-2.48% | -0.68%-3.28% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PSQO INTM | 7d58d | 40d185d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
PSQO | INTM | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.84 | $50.93 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $20.83 | $50.97 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PSQO | INTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.84 | $50.93 |
| 1D performance | +0.04% | -0.09% |
| AuM | $293.91 M | $101.30 M |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
PSQO | INTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Palmer Square | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 168 | 58 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 11, 2024 | July 23, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PSQO
USA
36.63%
Other
63.37%
INTM
USA
38.54%
Other
61.46%
Sectors
PSQO
Sovereign
11.25%
Industrials
7.71%
Other
81.04%
INTM
Municipal
38.54%
Other
61.46%
Advertisement
Diversification
PSQO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.98%
INTM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PSQO
Fidelity Investments Money Market Treasury Portfolio
2.18%
USA, Notes 3.5% 31jan2028, USD (U-2028)
1.96%
USA, Notes 4% 31may2028, USD (BC-2028)
1.81%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31dec2027, USD (AH-2027)
1.80%
USA, Notes 4% 31jan2029, USD (U-2029)
1.54%
USA, Bills 0% 5nov2026, USD (182D)
1.26%
USA, Bills 0% 19nov2026, USD (182D)
1.26%
US14317KAQ76
1.09%
US38190MAJ09
0.73%
US89640AAY29
0.73%
US29002GAU58
0.73%
US14315GAW50
0.73%
Elmwood CLO 2025-1A, FRN 22apr2038, USD (ABS, A)
0.73%
US671000AL11
0.72%
US55956CAA99
0.72%
INTM
US55374SAH31
1.79%
Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust, 6.25% 1dec2035, USD (2025)
1.70%
US71783TAK60
1.65%
US64763HMN25
1.59%
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, 5% 1dec2041, USD (2026A)
1.59%
Black Belt Energy Gas District, 5% 1oct2035, USD (2025)
1.58%
Southeast Energy Authority, 5% 1nov2035, USD (2024A)
1.56%
US137288HP49
1.53%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5% 1jul2046, USD (2016A)
1.50%
Puerto Rico, 4% 1jul2041, USD
1.42%
Cape Coral, 4% 1oct2042, USD (2017)
1.42%
US13013JCM62
1.34%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 5.25% 1aug2031, USD (2020)
1.33%
US20775DX231
1.33%
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, 4% 1aug2039, USD (2019A-1)
1.25%
Frequently asked questions about PSQO and INTM
How have the PSQO and INTM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, PSQO is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD), while INTM has lost -1.79%. That puts PSQO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PSQO or INTM?
Year-to-date, the PSQO ETF saw +$173M in flows, compared to +$12M for INTM.
Which ETF is more volatile: PSQO or INTM?
Over the past year, PSQO had a volatility of 0.67%, while INTM experienced 2.18%.
Which ETF is bigger: PSQO or INTM?
As of September 2, 2026, PSQO holds $293.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while INTM manages $101.30 M.
What sectors do the PSQO and INTM ETFs invest in?
PSQO leans toward sectors like Sovereign and Industrials. Meanwhile, INTM focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the PSQO ETF and INTM ETF?
PSQO top holdings include Fidelity Investments Money Market Treasury Portfolio, USA, Notes 3.5% 31jan2028, USD (U-2028) and USA, Notes 4% 31may2028, USD (BC-2028). INTM holds in its top three: US55374SAH31, Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust, 6.25% 1dec2035, USD (2025) and US71783TAK60.
Which ETF is more diversified: PSQO or INTM?
PSQO holds 426 securities with 17.98% of its assets in the top 15. INTM has 172 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.56%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
