PSFFvsBUFTETF Comparison
Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) and FT Vest Buffered Allocation Defensive ETF (BUFT) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. They also belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PSFF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.72%, versus 1.21% for BUFT. PSFF is up 8.68% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. BUFT performs worse with 7.14% YTD performance, and +$14M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSFF and BUFT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PSFF vs BUFT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSFF BUFT | +1.27%+0.89% | +2.65%+1.90% | +8.68%+7.14% | +12.56%+9.93% | +42.42%+31.13% | +57.04%n/a |
| Flows | PSFF BUFT | +$6M+$3M | +$13M+$13M | +$16M+$14M | +$43M+$20M | +$291M+$32M | +$415M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSFF BUFT | +5.23%+2.51% | +5.12%+3.04% | +7.64%+5.91% | +8.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PSFF BUFT | -1.16%-0.87% | -3.30%-1.83% | -11.01%-8.01% | -11.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PSFF BUFT | 8d12d | 41d9d | 125d79d | 125dn/a |
PSFF | BUFT | |
Last sale 9/4/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.09 | $26.39 |
| Previous close 09/03/2026 | $35.13 | $26.40 |
| Consolidated volume 09/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PSFF | BUFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.09 | $26.39 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $608.54 M | $160.78 M |
| E/R | 0.72% | 1.21% |
PSFF | BUFT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 1 | 1 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2020 | October 27, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 12 holdings out of 12
Total weight of top 7 holdings out of 7
