PSCTvsSCOWETF Comparison
ETF 1
PSCT
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
This fund is part of
US Info. Technology
+0.37%
VS
ETF 2
SCOW
Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
-0.48%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) belongs to the US Info. Technology segment. Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PSCT's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, SCOW's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. PSCT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.59% for SCOW. PSCT is up 38.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$41M in YTD flows. SCOW performs worse with 17.42% YTD performance, and +$507K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSCT and SCOW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PSCT vs SCOW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSCT SCOW | -3.85%-1.95% | -5.21%+10.49% | +38.90%+17.42% | +58.65%+13.48% | +75.50%n/a | +62.46%n/a |
| Flows | PSCT SCOW | +$895K- | -$11M- | +$41M+$507K | +$42M+$501K | -$21M- | -$120M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSCT SCOW | +37.79%+14.80% | +34.14%+17.16% | +29.86%n/a | +28.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PSCT SCOW | -18.55%-3.53% | -18.55%-10.09% | -33.83%n/a | -34.74%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PSCT SCOW | 70d23d | 70d208d | 287dn/a | 1353dn/a |
Trading data
PSCT | SCOW | |
Last sale 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM | $78.16 | |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $78.71 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PSCT | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/9/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PSCT | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.16 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | – |
| AuM | $488.94 M | $1.72 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
PSCT | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Information Technology Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 79 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 7, 2010 | August 27, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PSCT
USA
98.87%
Other
1.13%
SCOW
USA
98.25%
Other
1.75%
Sectors
PSCT
Technology
77.53%
Industrials
7.55%
Other
14.92%
SCOW
Technology
26.14%
Finance
22.73%
Healthcare
11.96%
Energy
7.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.47%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.13%
Other
16.62%
Diversification
PSCT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.63%
SCOW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.29%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PSCT
ViaSat, Inc.
4.52%
Ralliant Corp.
3.55%
Qorvo, Inc.
3.40%
FormFactor, Inc.
3.08%
Plexus Corp.
3.05%
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
2.90%
EPAM Systems, Inc.
2.65%
Clear Secure, Inc.
2.53%
MaxLinear, Inc.
2.28%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
2.19%
Itron, Inc.
2.15%
Box, Inc.
2.13%
Life360, Inc.
2.12%
Kulicke & Soffa Industries, Inc.
2.05%
RingCentral, Inc.
2.03%
SCOW
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
6.12%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
4.85%
Etsy, Inc.
4.75%
Enova International, Inc.
4.68%
Match Group, Inc.
3.80%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
3.58%
Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.
3.31%
Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp.
3.17%
Paycom Software, Inc.
3.11%
Box, Inc.
3.07%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
2.45%
NMI Holdings, Inc.
2.09%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.
1.87%
Qorvo, Inc.
1.76%
Teradata Corp.
1.68%
Frequently asked questions about PSCT and SCOW
How have the PSCT and SCOW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, PSCT is up 38.9% year-to-date (YTD), while SCOW has returned 17.42%. That puts PSCT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PSCT or SCOW?
Year-to-date, the PSCT ETF saw +$41M in flows, compared to +$507K for SCOW.
Which ETF is more volatile: PSCT or SCOW?
Over the past year, PSCT had a volatility of 34.14%, while SCOW experienced 17.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: PSCT or SCOW?
As of September 8, 2026, PSCT holds $488.94 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCOW manages $1.72 M.
What sectors do the PSCT and SCOW ETFs invest in?
PSCT leans toward sectors like Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCOW focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PSCT ETF and SCOW ETF?
PSCT top holdings include ViaSat, Inc., Ralliant Corp. and Qorvo, Inc.. SCOW holds in its top three: Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., Jackson Financial, Inc. and Etsy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PSCT or SCOW?
PSCT holds 68 securities with 40.63% of its assets in the top 15. SCOW has 79 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.29%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
