Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PSCFvsSMDVETF Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF (PSCF) belongs to the US Financials segment. ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) is part of the US High Dividend segment. PSCF's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Real Estate and Information Technology. In contrast, SMDV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Utilities. PSCF is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.4% for SMDV. PSCF is up 0.14% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. SMDV performs better with 4.93% YTD performance, and -$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSCF and SMDV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PSCF vs SMDV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSCF SMDV | -6.49%-5.42% | -1.18%+2.70% | +0.14%+4.93% | +12.82%+6.55% | +37.71%+24.03% | +11.35%+17.49% |
| Flows | PSCF SMDV | -$7K-$7M | +$4M-$20M | +$4M-$15M | +$2M-$87M | -$7M-$303M | -$12M-$257M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSCF SMDV | +16.84%+14.82% | +21.60%+18.40% | +22.76%+19.13% | +22.49%+18.84% |
| Max drawdown | PSCF SMDV | -6.77%-6.23% | -14.71%-11.67% | -24.17%-21.17% | -36.71%-21.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | PSCF SMDV | 30d22d | 52d105d | 415d437d | 1094d437d |
PSCF | SMDV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.09 | $68.84 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $57.55 | $69.34 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PSCF | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PSCF | SMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.09 | $68.84 |
| 1D performance | -0.80% | -0.72% |
| AuM | $23.04 M | $630.32 M |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.4% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PSCF and SMDV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PSCF is up 0.14% year-to-date (YTD), while SMDV has returned 4.93%. That puts SMDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PSCF or SMDV?
Year-to-date, the PSCF ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to -$15M for SMDV.
Which ETF is more volatile: PSCF or SMDV?
Over the past year, PSCF had a volatility of 21.6%, while SMDV experienced 18.4%.
Which ETF is bigger: PSCF or SMDV?
As of March 10, 2026, PSCF holds $23.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMDV manages $630.32 M.
What sectors do the PSCF and SMDV ETFs invest in?
PSCF leans toward sectors like Financials and Real Estate. Meanwhile, SMDV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the PSCF ETF and SMDV ETF?
PSCF top holdings include CARETRUST REIT, JACKSON FINANCIAL INC and LINCOLN NATL. SMDV holds in its top three: MATSON, INSPERITY and STEPAN.
Which ETF is more diversified: PSCF or SMDV?
PSCF holds 163 securities with 23.13% of its assets in the top 15. SMDV has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.17%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
