Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PRFZvsSCDSETF Comparison
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) is part of the US Small Cap segment. PRFZ's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, SCDS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. PRFZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.4% for SCDS. PRFZ is down -0.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$25M in YTD flows. SCDS performs better with 0.99% YTD performance, and -$4K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRFZ and SCDS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PRFZ vs SCDS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRFZ SCDS | -4.77%-4.92% | -3.03%-1.35% | -0.48%+0.99% | +21.43%+20.99% | +48.66%n/a | +31.10%n/a |
| Flows | PRFZ SCDS | +$18M-$4K | +$14M-$4K | +$25M-$4K | -$190M-$17K | -$149M- | +$32M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRFZ SCDS | +17.20%+16.80% | +22.48%+22.22% | +20.52%n/a | +21.32%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PRFZ SCDS | -8.19%-7.40% | -16.14%-16.31% | -26.51%n/a | -26.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PRFZ SCDS | 49d49d | 46d52d | 283dn/a | 283dn/a |
PRFZ | SCDS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $45.49 | $60.57 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $45.65 | $60.56 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PRFZ | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PRFZ | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.49 | $60.57 |
| 1D performance | -0.35% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $2.59 B | $7.27 M |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.4% |
PRFZ | SCDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1282 | 236 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2006 | August 7, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PRFZ and SCDS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PRFZ is down -0.48% year-to-date (YTD), while SCDS has returned 0.99%. That puts SCDS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRFZ or SCDS?
Year-to-date, the PRFZ ETF saw +$25M in flows, compared to -$4K for SCDS.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRFZ or SCDS?
Over the past year, PRFZ had a volatility of 22.48%, while SCDS experienced 22.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRFZ or SCDS?
As of March 12, 2026, PRFZ holds $2.59 B in assets under management (AUM), while SCDS manages $7.27 M.
What sectors do the PRFZ and SCDS ETFs invest in?
PRFZ leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCDS focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PRFZ ETF and SCDS ETF?
PRFZ top holdings include OPENDOOR TECHNOLOGIES INC, HECLA MINING and IONIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC. SCDS holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, FABRINET and VICOR.
Which ETF is more diversified: PRFZ or SCDS?
PRFZ holds 1412 securities with 6.62% of its assets in the top 15. SCDS has 255 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.48%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
