PRFZvsQSMLETF Comparison
VS
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Growth Fund (QSML) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. PRFZ's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, QSML's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. PRFZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.36%, versus 0.38% for QSML. PRFZ is up 16.2% year-to-date (YTD) with -$256M in YTD flows. QSML performs worse with 15.71% YTD performance, and +$827K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRFZ and QSML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PRFZ vs QSML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRFZ QSML | -6.18%-4.22% | +0.07%+4.25% | +16.20%+15.71% | +17.99%+18.07% | +61.36%n/a | +54.04%n/a |
| Flows | PRFZ QSML | +$2M+$858K | -$40M+$858K | -$256M+$827K | -$273M+$2M | -$407M- | -$234M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRFZ QSML | +14.13%+15.39% | +17.45%+16.82% | +20.29%n/a | +21.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PRFZ QSML | -6.52%-5.33% | -10.44%-10.76% | -26.51%n/a | -26.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PRFZ QSML | 30d19d | 84d85d | 283dn/a | 283dn/a |
Trading data
PRFZ | QSML | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 6:36 PM | $53.09 | $33.26 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $53.15 | $33.70 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PRFZ | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 6:36 PM
Live
Closed
PRFZ | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.09 | $33.26 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -1.31% |
| AuM | $2.73 B | $12.49 M |
| E/R | 0.36% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
PRFZ | QSML | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth SmallCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 1499 | 375 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2006 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PRFZ
USA
97.66%
Other
2.34%
QSML
USA
96.46%
Other
3.54%
Sectors
PRFZ
Finance
23.63%
Healthcare
17.84%
Technology
16.07%
Industrials
10.34%
Other
32.12%
QSML
Finance
19.91%
Technology
16.58%
Healthcare
13.44%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.11%
Industrials
10.06%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.68%
Other
20.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
PRFZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.25%
QSML
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
9.03%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PRFZ
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
0.44%
Roivant Sciences Ltd.
0.40%
ATI, Inc.
0.40%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.39%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
0.36%
SharkNinja, Inc.
0.34%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.34%
Enova International, Inc.
0.34%
Bio-Techne Corp.
0.34%
Crescent Energy Co.
0.32%
10X Genomics, Inc.
0.32%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.31%
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.31%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.30%
Compass, Inc. (New York)
0.30%
QSML
TG Therapeutics, Inc.
0.73%
Essent Group Ltd.
0.64%
MarketAxess Holdings, Inc.
0.62%
Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.
0.61%
Installed Building Products, Inc.
0.61%
Enova International, Inc.
0.60%
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
0.60%
Lyft, Inc.
0.59%
ACI Worldwide, Inc.
0.59%
Genpact Ltd.
0.58%
Acushnet Holdings Corp.
0.58%
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.58%
Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
0.57%
Mercury General Corp.
0.57%
Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.56%
Frequently asked questions about PRFZ and QSML
How have the PRFZ and QSML ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, PRFZ is up 16.2% year-to-date (YTD), while QSML has returned 15.71%. That puts PRFZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRFZ or QSML?
Year-to-date, the PRFZ ETF saw -$256M in flows, compared to +$827K for QSML.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRFZ or QSML?
Over the past year, PRFZ had a volatility of 17.45%, while QSML experienced 16.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRFZ or QSML?
As of September 15, 2026, PRFZ holds $2.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while QSML manages $12.49 M.
What sectors do the PRFZ and QSML ETFs invest in?
PRFZ leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, QSML focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PRFZ ETF and QSML ETF?
PRFZ top holdings include Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., Roivant Sciences Ltd. and ATI, Inc.. QSML holds in its top three: TG Therapeutics, Inc., Essent Group Ltd. and MarketAxess Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PRFZ or QSML?
PRFZ holds 1500 securities with 5.25% of its assets in the top 15. QSML has 375 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.03%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
