Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PRFvsFNDXETF Comparison
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. PRF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.25% for FNDX. PRF is up 1.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$37M in YTD flows. FNDX performs better with 2.61% YTD performance, and +$942M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRF and FNDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PRF vs FNDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRF FNDX | -3.13%-2.98% | +1.36%+2.09% | +1.75%+2.61% | +22.26%+22.25% | +67.17%+68.48% | +70.76%+75.95% |
| Flows | PRF FNDX | +$57M+$354M | +$63M+$1.22B | +$37M+$942M | -$71M+$2.92B | -$176M+$6.36B | +$698M+$10.19B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRF FNDX | +11.04%+10.72% | +16.20%+16.47% | +13.34%+13.44% | +15.13%+15.36% |
| Max drawdown | PRF FNDX | -4.57%-4.36% | -12.61%-12.73% | -15.88%-16.26% | -19.68%-18.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | PRF FNDX | 29d29d | 51d52d | 211d131d | 695d545d |
PRF | FNDX | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 6:00 PM | $47.64 | $27.89 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.72 | $27.93 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PRF | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PRF | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.64 | $27.89 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $8.75 B | $23.62 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.25% |
PRF | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 931 | 659 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 19, 2005 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PRF and FNDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PRF is up 1.75% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDX has returned 2.61%. That puts FNDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRF or FNDX?
Year-to-date, the PRF ETF saw +$37M in flows, compared to +$942M for FNDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRF or FNDX?
Over the past year, PRF had a volatility of 16.2%, while FNDX experienced 16.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRF or FNDX?
As of March 12, 2026, PRF holds $8.75 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDX manages $23.62 B.
What sectors do the PRF and FNDX ETFs invest in?
PRF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, FNDX focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PRF ETF and FNDX ETF?
PRF top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. FNDX holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: PRF or FNDX?
PRF holds 982 securities with 27.71% of its assets in the top 15. FNDX has 691 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.31%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
