PRFvsFNDXETF Comparison
VS
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. PRF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.25% for FNDX. PRF is up 21.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$146M in YTD flows. FNDX performs better with 22.23% YTD performance, and +$1.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRF and FNDX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PRF vs FNDX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRF FNDX | +3.39%+3.95% | +4.47%+4.66% | +21.86%+22.23% | +25.08%+25.02% | +93.62%+91.99% | +85.87%+90.74% |
| Flows | PRF FNDX | +$12M+$307M | +$55M+$882M | -$146M+$1.70B | -$92M+$2.30B | -$278M+$6.03B | +$337M+$9.79B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRF FNDX | +7.93%+7.66% | +10.48%+9.98% | +12.94%+12.95% | +14.90%+15.02% |
| Max drawdown | PRF FNDX | -3.38%-3.68% | -6.61%-6.11% | -15.88%-16.26% | -19.68%-18.97% |
| Max drawdown duration | PRF FNDX | 48d46d | 61d63d | 211d131d | 695d545d |
Trading data
PRF | FNDX | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.13 | $32.71 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $56.57 | $32.89 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PRF | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PRF | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.13 | $32.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.78% | -0.55% |
| AuM | $10.17 B | $28.60 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
PRF | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 994 | 706 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 19, 2005 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PRF
USA
97.12%
Other
2.88%
FNDX
USA
97.21%
Other
2.79%
Sectors
PRF
Technology
26.1%
Finance
18.54%
Healthcare
12.93%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.73%
Energy
8.15%
Industrials
7.58%
Other
16.97%
FNDX
Technology
24.64%
Finance
16.59%
Healthcare
12.6%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Energy
10.06%
Industrials
7.06%
Other
18.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
PRF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.68%
FNDX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
PRF
Apple, Inc.
4.74%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.36%
Microsoft Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.27%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.07%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.89%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.79%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.64%
Intel Corp.
1.37%
Chevron Corp.
1.34%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.16%
Johnson & Johnson
1.14%
Bank of America Corp.
1.10%
Citigroup, Inc.
0.84%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.83%
FNDX
Apple, Inc.
5.02%
Microsoft Corp.
3.20%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.43%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.04%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.98%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.82%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.79%
Chevron Corp.
1.65%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.45%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.40%
Intel Corp.
1.25%
Johnson & Johnson
1.08%
Walmart, Inc.
1.01%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.99%
Frequently asked questions about PRF and FNDX
How have the PRF and FNDX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, PRF is up 21.86% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDX has returned 22.23%. That puts FNDX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRF or FNDX?
Year-to-date, the PRF ETF saw -$146M in flows, compared to +$1.70B for FNDX.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRF or FNDX?
Over the past year, PRF had a volatility of 10.48%, while FNDX experienced 9.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRF or FNDX?
As of October 29, 2026, PRF holds $10.17 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDX manages $28.60 B.
What sectors do the PRF and FNDX ETFs invest in?
PRF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FNDX focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PRF ETF and FNDX ETF?
PRF top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. FNDX holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PRF or FNDX?
PRF holds 994 securities with 28.68% of its assets in the top 15. FNDX has 711 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.76%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
