PRFvsFNDBETF Comparison
VS
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. PRF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. PRF is up 21.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$146M in YTD flows. FNDB performs worse with 21.73% YTD performance, and +$234M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRF and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PRF vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRF FNDB | +3.39%+3.91% | +4.47%+4.18% | +21.86%+21.73% | +25.08%+24.54% | +93.62%+89.97% | +85.87%+86.66% |
| Flows | PRF FNDB | +$12M+$40K | +$55M+$46M | -$146M+$234M | -$92M+$250M | -$278M+$434M | +$337M+$603M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRF FNDB | +7.93%+7.77% | +10.48%+10.27% | +12.94%+13.28% | +14.90%+15.30% |
| Max drawdown | PRF FNDB | -3.38%-3.80% | -6.61%-6.34% | -15.88%-16.85% | -19.68%-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | PRF FNDB | 48d66d | 61d63d | 211d213d | 695d546d |
Trading data
PRF | FNDB | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.13 | $31.78 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $56.57 | $31.97 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.13 | $31.78 |
| 1D performance | -0.78% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $10.17 B | $1.51 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 994 | 1408 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 19, 2005 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PRF
USA
97.12%
Other
2.88%
FNDB
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
Sectors
PRF
Technology
26.1%
Finance
18.54%
Healthcare
12.93%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.73%
Energy
8.15%
Industrials
7.58%
Other
16.97%
FNDB
Technology
24.07%
Finance
17.23%
Healthcare
12.44%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.52%
Energy
9.69%
Industrials
7.33%
Other
18.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
PRF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.68%
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.3%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
PRF
Apple, Inc.
4.74%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.36%
Microsoft Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.27%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.07%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.89%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.79%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.64%
Intel Corp.
1.37%
Chevron Corp.
1.34%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.16%
Johnson & Johnson
1.14%
Bank of America Corp.
1.10%
Citigroup, Inc.
0.84%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.83%
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.81%
Microsoft Corp.
3.05%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.23%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.93%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.91%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.74%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.67%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.58%
Chevron Corp.
1.51%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.40%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.34%
Intel Corp.
1.20%
Johnson & Johnson
1.04%
Walmart, Inc.
0.96%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
0.91%
Frequently asked questions about PRF and FNDB
How have the PRF and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 29, 2026, PRF is up 21.86% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 21.73%. That puts PRF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRF or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the PRF ETF saw -$146M in flows, compared to +$234M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRF or FNDB?
Over the past year, PRF had a volatility of 10.48%, while FNDB experienced 10.27%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRF or FNDB?
As of October 29, 2026, PRF holds $10.17 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.51 B.
What sectors do the PRF and FNDB ETFs invest in?
PRF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PRF ETF and FNDB ETF?
PRF top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. FNDB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and ExxonMobil Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PRF or FNDB?
PRF holds 994 securities with 28.68% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1410 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.3%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
