PRFvsFNDBETF Comparison
VS
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. PRF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. PRF is up 19.84% year-to-date (YTD) with -$158M in YTD flows. FNDB performs worse with 19.52% YTD performance, and +$230M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRF and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PRF vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/14/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRF FNDB | -1.18%-1.31% | +2.90%+2.96% | +19.84%+19.52% | +26.15%+25.29% | +76.25%+72.74% | +90.24%+90.67% |
| Flows | PRF FNDB | +$35M+$19M | +$24M+$91M | -$158M+$230M | -$143M+$237M | -$236M+$468M | +$405M+$604M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRF FNDB | +8.42%+8.16% | +10.83%+10.64% | +13.14%+13.48% | +15.01%+15.41% |
| Max drawdown | PRF FNDB | -1.84%-1.90% | -6.61%-6.34% | -15.88%-16.85% | -19.68%-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | PRF FNDB | 11d29d | 61d63d | 211d213d | 695d546d |
Trading data
PRF | FNDB | |
Last sale 9/15/2026 at 6:26 PM | $55.71 | $31.44 |
| Previous close 09/14/2026 | $55.81 | $31.48 |
| Consolidated volume 09/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/15/2026 at 6:26 PM
Live
Closed
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $55.71 | $31.44 |
| 1D performance | -0.18% | -0.13% |
| AuM | $10.03 B | $1.49 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 999 | 1411 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 19, 2005 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PRF
USA
97.46%
Other
2.54%
FNDB
USA
97.64%
Other
2.36%
Sectors
PRF
Technology
24.51%
Finance
19.6%
Healthcare
12.51%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.65%
Industrials
8.07%
Energy
7.97%
Other
17.69%
FNDB
Technology
22.65%
Finance
17.87%
Healthcare
11.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.56%
Energy
9.64%
Industrials
8.04%
Other
19.3%
Advertisement
Diversification
PRF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.77%
FNDB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
26.05%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PRF
Apple, Inc.
4.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.49%
Microsoft Corp.
2.23%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.97%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.89%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.83%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.69%
Intel Corp.
1.63%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.46%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.36%
Chevron Corp.
1.28%
Bank of America Corp.
1.26%
Johnson & Johnson
1.18%
Citigroup, Inc.
0.88%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.83%
FNDB
Apple, Inc.
4.81%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.31%
Microsoft Corp.
2.18%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.72%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.65%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.62%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.56%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.55%
Chevron Corp.
1.47%
Intel Corp.
1.47%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.38%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.28%
Johnson & Johnson
1.07%
Bank of America Corp.
1.03%
Walmart, Inc.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about PRF and FNDB
How have the PRF and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 14, 2026, PRF is up 19.84% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 19.52%. That puts PRF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRF or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the PRF ETF saw -$158M in flows, compared to +$230M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRF or FNDB?
Over the past year, PRF had a volatility of 10.83%, while FNDB experienced 10.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRF or FNDB?
As of September 14, 2026, PRF holds $10.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.49 B.
What sectors do the PRF and FNDB ETFs invest in?
PRF leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PRF ETF and FNDB ETF?
PRF top holdings include Apple, Inc., Alphabet, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. FNDB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PRF or FNDB?
PRF holds 999 securities with 27.77% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1412 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.05%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
