Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PRFvsFNDBETF Comparison
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF (FNDB) is part of the US All Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. PRF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.25% for FNDB. PRF is up 1.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$37M in YTD flows. FNDB performs better with 2.54% YTD performance, and +$57M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRF and FNDB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PRF vs FNDB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRF FNDB | -3.13%-3.22% | +1.36%+1.89% | +1.75%+2.54% | +22.26%+22.00% | +67.17%+66.41% | +70.76%+71.91% |
| Flows | PRF FNDB | +$57M+$24M | +$63M+$68M | +$37M+$57M | -$71M+$87M | -$176M+$321M | +$698M+$479M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRF FNDB | +11.04%+11.09% | +16.20%+16.78% | +13.34%+13.77% | +15.13%+15.66% |
| Max drawdown | PRF FNDB | -4.57%-4.63% | -12.61%-12.93% | -15.88%-16.85% | -19.68%-19.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | PRF FNDB | 29d29d | 51d52d | 211d213d | 695d546d |
PRF | FNDB | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 7:18 PM | $47.72 | $27.23 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $47.72 | $27.23 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.72 | $27.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $8.75 B | $1.13 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.25% |
PRF | FNDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index |
| N° of holdings | 931 | 1290 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 19, 2005 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PRF and FNDB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PRF is up 1.75% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDB has returned 2.54%. That puts FNDB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRF or FNDB?
Year-to-date, the PRF ETF saw +$37M in flows, compared to +$57M for FNDB.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRF or FNDB?
Over the past year, PRF had a volatility of 16.2%, while FNDB experienced 16.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRF or FNDB?
As of March 12, 2026, PRF holds $8.75 B in assets under management (AUM), while FNDB manages $1.13 B.
What sectors do the PRF and FNDB ETFs invest in?
PRF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, FNDB focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PRF ETF and FNDB ETF?
PRF top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. FNDB holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: PRF or FNDB?
PRF holds 982 securities with 27.71% of its assets in the top 15. FNDB has 1372 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.76%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.