Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PQNTvsEFAXETF Comparison
Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT) and SPDR MSCI EAFE Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (EFAX) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. PQNT's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, EFAX's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. PQNT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.2% for EFAX. PQNT is up 2.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. EFAX performs worse with 1.32% YTD performance, and +$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PQNT and EFAX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PQNT vs EFAX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PQNT EFAX | -3.78%-5.98% | +5.00%+2.68% | +2.71%+1.32% | n/a+22.35% | n/a+57.26% | n/a+47.46% |
| Flows | PQNT EFAX | -$1M- | -$1M+$30M | -$1M+$5M | -+$83M | -+$122M | -+$209M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PQNT EFAX | +15.39%+14.83% | n/a+16.30% | n/a+13.90% | n/a+15.08% |
| Max drawdown | PQNT EFAX | -7.78%-8.50% | n/a-14.17% | n/a-14.22% | n/a-31.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | PQNT EFAX | 9d10d | n/a41d | n/a53d | n/a910d |
PQNT | EFAX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:57 PM | $21.18 | $50.54 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $21.48 | $51.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PQNT | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PQNT | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.18 | $50.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.39% | -1.18% |
| AuM | $8.65 M | $480.46 M |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.2% |
PQNT | EFAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Pictet Asset Management | SPDR |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE ex Fossil Fuels Index |
| N° of holdings | 225 | 610 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 15, 2025 | October 24, 2016 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PQNT and EFAX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PQNT is up 2.71% year-to-date (YTD), while EFAX has returned 1.32%. That puts PQNT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PQNT or EFAX?
Year-to-date, the PQNT ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$5M for EFAX.
Which ETF is bigger: PQNT or EFAX?
As of March 10, 2026, PQNT holds $8.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFAX manages $480.46 M.
What sectors do the PQNT and EFAX ETFs invest in?
PQNT leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EFAX focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PQNT ETF and EFAX ETF?
PQNT top holdings include ASML HOLDING, SAP SE and SONY GROUP CORPORATION. EFAX holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: PQNT or EFAX?
PQNT holds 232 securities with 21.01% of its assets in the top 15. EFAX has 642 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.71%.
ETF Takeover: Discover the Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT)
What's the Fund | Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
