Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
POWRvsZAPETF Comparison
iShares US Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. POWR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, ZAP's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. POWR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.5% for ZAP. POWR is up 11.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$44M in YTD flows. ZAP performs better with 12.16% YTD performance, and +$74M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POWR and ZAP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POWR vs ZAP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POWR ZAP | +3.13%+3.53% | +7.80%+11.52% | +11.06%+12.16% | +20.19%+37.97% | +30.42%n/a | +99.68%n/a |
| Flows | POWR ZAP | +$30M+$34M | +$46M+$86M | +$44M+$74M | +$33M+$249M | +$1M- | +$9M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POWR ZAP | +16.06%+14.41% | +21.12%+15.91% | +19.01%n/a | +22.88%n/a |
| Max drawdown | POWR ZAP | -4.42%-3.08% | -17.56%-8.69% | -22.61%n/a | -24.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | POWR ZAP | 40d13d | 76d26d | 663dn/a | 160dn/a |
POWR | ZAP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.18 | $32.41 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $26.13 | $32.57 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
POWR | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
POWR | ZAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.18 | $32.41 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.51% |
| AuM | $126.48 M | $355.03 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.5% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the POWR and ZAP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, POWR is up 11.06% year-to-date (YTD), while ZAP has returned 12.16%. That puts ZAP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: POWR or ZAP?
Year-to-date, the POWR ETF saw +$44M in flows, compared to +$74M for ZAP.
Which ETF is more volatile: POWR or ZAP?
Over the past year, POWR had a volatility of 21.12%, while ZAP experienced 15.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: POWR or ZAP?
As of March 10, 2026, POWR holds $126.48 M in assets under management (AUM), while ZAP manages $355.03 M.
What sectors do the POWR and ZAP ETFs invest in?
POWR leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, ZAP focuses on Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the POWR ETF and ZAP ETF?
POWR top holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY, QUANTA SERVICES and EATON CORP PLC. ZAP holds in its top three: AMETEK, QUANTA SERVICES and US6362744095.
Which ETF is more diversified: POWR or ZAP?
POWR holds 69 securities with 60.43% of its assets in the top 15. ZAP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.14%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
