Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
POWRvsRBLDETF Comparison
iShares US Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) and First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF (RBLD) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. POWR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, RBLD's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. POWR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.65% for RBLD. POWR is up 11.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$44M in YTD flows. RBLD performs worse with 10.46% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POWR and RBLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POWR vs RBLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POWR RBLD | +3.13%-0.52% | +7.80%+8.76% | +11.06%+10.46% | +20.19%+27.55% | +30.42%+78.06% | +99.68%+65.98% |
| Flows | POWR RBLD | +$30M- | +$46M- | +$44M- | +$33M+$4M | +$1M+$7M | +$9M+$8M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POWR RBLD | +16.06%+14.21% | +21.12%+17.38% | +19.01%+15.32% | +22.88%+16.92% |
| Max drawdown | POWR RBLD | -4.42%-4.48% | -17.56%-12.55% | -22.61%-18.87% | -24.87%-24.63% |
| Max drawdown duration | POWR RBLD | 40d8d | 76d44d | 663d218d | 160d946d |
POWR | RBLD | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.18 | $82.32 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $26.13 | $82.35 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
POWR | RBLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
POWR | RBLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.18 | $82.32 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $126.48 M | $20.62 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.65% |
POWR | RBLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | S&P U.S. Power Infrastructure Select Index | Alerian U.S. NextGen Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 64 | 98 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 31, 2012 | October 13, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the POWR and RBLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, POWR is up 11.06% year-to-date (YTD), while RBLD has returned 10.46%. That puts POWR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: POWR or RBLD?
Year-to-date, the POWR ETF saw +$44M in flows, compared to - for RBLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: POWR or RBLD?
Over the past year, POWR had a volatility of 21.12%, while RBLD experienced 17.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: POWR or RBLD?
As of March 10, 2026, POWR holds $126.48 M in assets under management (AUM), while RBLD manages $20.62 M.
What sectors do the POWR and RBLD ETFs invest in?
POWR leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, RBLD focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the POWR ETF and RBLD ETF?
POWR top holdings include NEXTERA ENERGY, QUANTA SERVICES and EATON CORP PLC. RBLD holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US21873S1087 and COMFORT SYSTEMS USA.
Which ETF is more diversified: POWR or RBLD?
POWR holds 69 securities with 60.43% of its assets in the top 15. RBLD has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.44%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
