Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
POWvsPAVEETF Comparison
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. POW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, PAVE's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Utilities. POW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.47% for PAVE. POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18M in YTD flows. PAVE performs worse with 8.76% YTD performance, and +$1.05B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POW and PAVE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POW vs PAVE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POW PAVE | +0.34%-6.58% | +19.50%+5.17% | +23.28%+8.76% | n/a+38.54% | n/a+92.66% | n/a+119.98% |
| Flows | POW PAVE | +$14M+$565M | +$19M+$1.31B | +$18M+$1.05B | -+$1.28B | -+$3.60B | -+$5.55B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POW PAVE | +22.81%+19.64% | n/a+22.57% | n/a+20.32% | n/a+21.77% |
| Max drawdown | POW PAVE | -8.69%-7.29% | n/a-14.24% | n/a-26.27% | n/a-26.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | POW PAVE | 13d17d | n/a37d | n/a239d | n/a239d |
POW | PAVE | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.98 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $52.07 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
POW | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
POW | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $51.98 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.17% |
| AuM | $23.04 M | $11.86 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.47% |
POW | PAVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VistaShares | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Indxx U.S. Infrastructure Development Index |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 91 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 27, 2025 | March 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the POW and PAVE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD), while PAVE has returned 8.76%. That puts POW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: POW or PAVE?
Year-to-date, the POW ETF saw +$18M in flows, compared to +$1.05B for PAVE.
Which ETF is bigger: POW or PAVE?
As of March 11, 2026, POW holds $23.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while PAVE manages $11.86 B.
What sectors do the POW and PAVE ETFs invest in?
POW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. Meanwhile, PAVE focuses on Industrials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the POW ETF and PAVE ETF?
POW top holdings include LS ELECTRIC, DELTA ELECTRONIC and HYOSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES. PAVE holds in its top three: HOWMET AEROSPACE INC, PARKER HANNIFIN and QUANTA SERVICES.
Which ETF is more diversified: POW or PAVE?
POW holds 58 securities with 62.79% of its assets in the top 15. PAVE has 98 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.12%.
ETF Picks for Every Part of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Value Chain
Notable ETF Filings Recap: March 2024
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
