Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
POWvsMLPXETF Comparison
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. POW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, MLPX's top sector exposures are Energy, POW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.45% for MLPX. POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18M in YTD flows. MLPX performs worse with 20.58% YTD performance, and +$64M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POW and MLPX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POW vs MLPX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POW MLPX | +0.34%+5.86% | +19.50%+21.12% | +23.28%+20.58% | n/a+25.47% | n/a+113.47% | n/a+188.87% |
| Flows | POW MLPX | +$14M+$26M | +$19M+$86M | +$18M+$64M | --$23M | -+$1.16B | -+$1.21B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POW MLPX | +22.81%+15.02% | n/a+19.04% | n/a+16.90% | n/a+20.04% |
| Max drawdown | POW MLPX | -8.69%-3.15% | n/a-14.85% | n/a-16.47% | n/a-19.62% |
| Max drawdown duration | POW MLPX | 13d9d | n/a294d | n/a370d | n/a427d |
POW | MLPX | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 3:10 PM | $72.28 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $72.16 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
POW | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
POW | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $72.28 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.17% |
| AuM | $23.04 M | $3.19 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.45% |
POW | MLPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VistaShares | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 27, 2025 | August 6, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the POW and MLPX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD), while MLPX has returned 20.58%. That puts POW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: POW or MLPX?
Year-to-date, the POW ETF saw +$18M in flows, compared to +$64M for MLPX.
Which ETF is bigger: POW or MLPX?
As of March 11, 2026, POW holds $23.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while MLPX manages $3.19 B.
What sectors do the POW and MLPX ETFs invest in?
POW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. Meanwhile, MLPX focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the POW ETF and MLPX ETF?
POW top holdings include LS ELECTRIC, DELTA ELECTRONIC and HYOSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES. MLPX holds in its top three: WILLIAMS, TC ENERGY CORP and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: POW or MLPX?
POW holds 58 securities with 62.79% of its assets in the top 15. MLPX has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 84.93%.
ETF Picks for Every Part of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Value Chain
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
