Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
POWvsIFRAETF Comparison
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. POW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, IFRA's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Materials. POW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.3% for IFRA. POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18M in YTD flows. IFRA performs worse with 10.06% YTD performance, and +$217M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POW and IFRA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POW vs IFRA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POW IFRA | +0.34%-3.53% | +19.50%+8.18% | +23.28%+10.06% | n/a+31.19% | n/a+68.65% | n/a+85.81% |
| Flows | POW IFRA | +$14M+$116M | +$19M+$240M | +$18M+$217M | -+$787M | -+$774M | -+$2.28B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POW IFRA | +22.81%+14.10% | n/a+17.05% | n/a+16.41% | n/a+17.85% |
| Max drawdown | POW IFRA | -8.69%-4.36% | n/a-11.33% | n/a-19.89% | n/a-19.89% |
| Max drawdown duration | POW IFRA | 13d9d | n/a38d | n/a238d | n/a238d |
POW | IFRA | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $57.96 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $58.01 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
POW | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
POW | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $57.96 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.09% |
| AuM | $23.04 M | $3.73 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.3% |
POW | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VistaShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 146 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 27, 2025 | April 3, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the POW and IFRA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD), while IFRA has returned 10.06%. That puts POW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: POW or IFRA?
Year-to-date, the POW ETF saw +$18M in flows, compared to +$217M for IFRA.
Which ETF is bigger: POW or IFRA?
As of March 11, 2026, POW holds $23.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while IFRA manages $3.73 B.
What sectors do the POW and IFRA ETFs invest in?
POW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. Meanwhile, IFRA focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Materials.
What are the top holdings of the POW ETF and IFRA ETF?
POW top holdings include LS ELECTRIC, DELTA ELECTRONIC and HYOSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES. IFRA holds in its top three: HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, TASEKO MINES and CENTURY ALUMINUM.
Which ETF is more diversified: POW or IFRA?
POW holds 58 securities with 62.79% of its assets in the top 15. IFRA has 151 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.1%.
ETF Picks for Every Part of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Value Chain
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
How US Infrastructure Can Benefit Your Portfolio
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
