Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
POWvsEMLPETF Comparison
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure ETF (EMLP) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. POW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, EMLP's top sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. POW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.95% for EMLP. POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD) with +$18M in YTD flows. EMLP performs worse with 14.53% YTD performance, and +$79M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POW and EMLP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POW vs EMLP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POW EMLP | +0.34%+5.01% | +19.50%+14.56% | +23.28%+14.53% | n/a+23.42% | n/a+83.77% | n/a+125.27% |
| Flows | POW EMLP | +$14M+$63M | +$19M+$100M | +$18M+$79M | -+$196M | -+$71M | -+$381M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POW EMLP | +22.81%+10.15% | n/a+13.57% | n/a+13.04% | n/a+14.61% |
| Max drawdown | POW EMLP | -8.69%-1.89% | n/a-11.20% | n/a-11.35% | n/a-14.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | POW EMLP | 13d8d | n/a106d | n/a177d | n/a329d |
POW | EMLP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.53 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $43.32 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
POW | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $43.53 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.48% |
| AuM | $23.04 M | $3.95 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.95% |
POW | EMLP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | VistaShares | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 60 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 27, 2025 | June 20, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the POW and EMLP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, POW is up 23.28% year-to-date (YTD), while EMLP has returned 14.53%. That puts POW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: POW or EMLP?
Year-to-date, the POW ETF saw +$18M in flows, compared to +$79M for EMLP.
Which ETF is bigger: POW or EMLP?
As of March 11, 2026, POW holds $23.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while EMLP manages $3.95 B.
What sectors do the POW and EMLP ETFs invest in?
POW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. Meanwhile, EMLP focuses on Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the POW ETF and EMLP ETF?
POW top holdings include LS ELECTRIC, DELTA ELECTRONIC and HYOSUNG HEAVY INDUSTRIES. EMLP holds in its top three: ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS UNT, ENERGY TRANSFER LP UNITS and MPLX COMMON UNITS.
Which ETF is more diversified: POW or EMLP?
POW holds 58 securities with 62.79% of its assets in the top 15. EMLP has 61 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.31%.
ETF Picks for Every Part of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Value Chain
How to Obtain Real Asset Exposure by Investing in Infrastructure ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
