Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PNQIvsTMFEETF Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) belongs to the Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity segment. Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF (TMFE) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PNQI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.5% for TMFE. PNQI is down -12.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$114M in YTD flows. TMFE performs better with -2.53% YTD performance, and -$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PNQI and TMFE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PNQI vs TMFE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PNQI TMFE | +0.10%-1.29% | -13.20%-3.25% | -12.23%-2.53% | +6.04%+11.78% | +87.43%+89.12% | -0.98%n/a |
| Flows | PNQI TMFE | -$35M-$4M | -$116M-$9M | -$114M-$6M | -$290M+$7M | -$336M+$46M | -$445M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PNQI TMFE | +18.27%+11.38% | +23.71%+17.43% | +20.64%+15.33% | +26.82%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PNQI TMFE | -16.24%-5.40% | -19.89%-11.79% | -23.96%-18.48% | -59.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PNQI TMFE | 90d58d | 171d35d | 128d139d | 1433dn/a |
PNQI | TMFE | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $47.34 | $28.41 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $47.40 | $28.55 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PNQI | TMFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PNQI | TMFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.34 | $28.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $563.37 M | $88.11 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.5% |
PNQI | TMFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ CTA Internet Index | Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 94 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2008 | December 31, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PNQI and TMFE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PNQI is down -12.23% year-to-date (YTD), while TMFE has lost -2.53%. That puts TMFE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PNQI or TMFE?
Year-to-date, the PNQI ETF saw -$114M in flows, compared to -$6M for TMFE.
Which ETF is more volatile: PNQI or TMFE?
Over the past year, PNQI had a volatility of 23.71%, while TMFE experienced 17.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: PNQI or TMFE?
As of March 11, 2026, PNQI holds $563.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while TMFE manages $88.11 M.
What sectors do the PNQI and TMFE ETFs invest in?
PNQI leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, TMFE focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PNQI ETF and TMFE ETF?
PNQI top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, META PLATFORMS and AMAZON.COM INC. TMFE holds in its top three: COSTCO WHOLESALE, ALPHABET INC-CL and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: PNQI or TMFE?
PNQI holds 77 securities with 75.65% of its assets in the top 15. TMFE has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 63.29%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
