Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PNQIvsQQHETF Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF
HCM Defender 100 ETF
Invesco NASDAQ Internet ETF (PNQI) belongs to the Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity segment. HCM Defender 100 ETF (QQH) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PNQI is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.98% for QQH. PNQI is down -12.23% year-to-date (YTD) with -$114M in YTD flows. QQH performs better with -2.9% YTD performance, and +$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PNQI and QQH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PNQI vs QQH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PNQI QQH | +0.10%-0.96% | -13.20%-5.48% | -12.23%-2.90% | +6.04%+25.65% | +87.43%+110.01% | -0.98%+88.64% |
| Flows | PNQI QQH | -$35M- | -$116M+$39M | -$114M+$16M | -$290M+$24M | -$336M+$133M | -$445M+$297M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PNQI QQH | +18.27%+21.77% | +23.71%+22.75% | +20.64%+21.89% | +26.82%+22.11% |
| Max drawdown | PNQI QQH | -16.24%-7.92% | -19.89%-13.04% | -23.96%-24.86% | -59.55%-41.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | PNQI QQH | 90d41d | 171d49d | 128d238d | 1433d878d |
PNQI | QQH | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $47.34 | $74.03 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $47.40 | $75.08 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PNQI | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PNQI | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.34 | $74.03 |
| 1D performance | -0.13% | -1.41% |
| AuM | $563.37 M | $675.81 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.98% |
PNQI | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Howard Capital Management |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ CTA Internet Index | HCM Defender 100 Index |
| N° of holdings | 67 | 84 |
| Asset class | Equities | Alternative |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 12, 2008 | October 10, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PNQI and QQH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PNQI is down -12.23% year-to-date (YTD), while QQH has lost -2.9%. That puts QQH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PNQI or QQH?
Year-to-date, the PNQI ETF saw -$114M in flows, compared to +$16M for QQH.
Which ETF is more volatile: PNQI or QQH?
Over the past year, PNQI had a volatility of 23.71%, while QQH experienced 22.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: PNQI or QQH?
As of March 11, 2026, PNQI holds $563.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQH manages $675.81 M.
What sectors do the PNQI and QQH ETFs invest in?
PNQI leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QQH focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PNQI ETF and QQH ETF?
PNQI top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, META PLATFORMS and AMAZON.COM INC. QQH holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PNQI or QQH?
PNQI holds 77 securities with 75.65% of its assets in the top 15. QQH has 88 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.27%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
