Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PKBvsIYJETF Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) belong to the same industry segment: US Industrials. PKB's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IYJ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Materials. PKB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.57%, versus 0.38% for IYJ. PKB is up 7.12% year-to-date (YTD) with +$118M in YTD flows. IYJ performs worse with 3.42% YTD performance, and +$724M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PKB and IYJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PKB vs IYJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PKB IYJ | -8.78%-4.94% | +1.26%+2.08% | +7.12%+3.42% | +48.29%+19.83% | +129.37%+63.82% | +108.49%+54.61% |
| Flows | PKB IYJ | +$27M+$349M | +$120M+$761M | +$118M+$724M | +$81M+$649M | +$94M+$734M | +$55M+$536M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PKB IYJ | +22.98%+15.56% | +24.68%+19.66% | +24.01%+16.13% | +25.12%+17.91% |
| Max drawdown | PKB IYJ | -10.20%-5.41% | -12.83%-13.69% | -29.59%-19.72% | -34.77%-26.37% |
| Max drawdown duration | PKB IYJ | 17d9d | 37d43d | 254d211d | 568d832d |
PKB | IYJ | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $97.98 | $151.87 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $99.22 | $153.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PKB | IYJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PKB | IYJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $97.98 | $151.87 |
| 1D performance | -1.25% | -0.88% |
| AuM | $414.14 M | $2.50 B |
| E/R | 0.57% | 0.38% |
PKB | IYJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index | Russell 1000 Industrials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 27 | 178 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 26, 2005 | June 12, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PKB and IYJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PKB is up 7.12% year-to-date (YTD), while IYJ has returned 3.42%. That puts PKB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PKB or IYJ?
Year-to-date, the PKB ETF saw +$118M in flows, compared to +$724M for IYJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: PKB or IYJ?
Over the past year, PKB had a volatility of 24.68%, while IYJ experienced 19.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: PKB or IYJ?
As of March 11, 2026, PKB holds $414.14 M in assets under management (AUM), while IYJ manages $2.50 B.
What sectors do the PKB and IYJ ETFs invest in?
PKB leans toward sectors like Industrials, Materials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IYJ focuses on Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PKB ETF and IYJ ETF?
PKB top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, CH1430134226 and CRH PLC. IYJ holds in its top three: VISA INCORPORATION, MASTERCARD and GENERAL ELECTRIC.
Which ETF is more diversified: PKB or IYJ?
PKB holds 30 securities with 60.01% of its assets in the top 15. IYJ has 198 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.21%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
