PIPEvsEINCETF Comparison
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Energy. PIPE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.46% for EINC. PIPE is up 28.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. EINC performs worse with 28.72% YTD performance, and -$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PIPE and EINC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PIPE vs EINC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PIPE EINC | +4.71%+5.55% | +0.66%+1.05% | +28.77%+28.72% | +34.56%+34.36% | n/a+108.19% | n/a+149.66% |
| Flows | PIPE EINC | -- | +$598K+$6M | +$2M-$16M | +$2M-$14M | -+$2M | -+$10M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PIPE EINC | +16.87%+16.92% | +16.18%+16.21% | n/a+16.82% | n/a+19.09% |
| Max drawdown | PIPE EINC | -9.06%-8.62% | -9.06%-9.07% | n/a-15.55% | n/a-20.00% |
| Max drawdown duration | PIPE EINC | 69d55d | 69d95d | n/a364d | n/a463d |
PIPE | EINC | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 7:59 PM | $30.16 | $120.38 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $29.99 | $119.99 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PIPE | EINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PIPE | EINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.16 | $120.38 |
| 1D performance | +0.58% | +0.33% |
| AuM | $65.36 M | $82.99 M |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.46% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
