PINCvsMBBAETF Comparison
PGIM Securitized Income ETF (PINC) and iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. PINC's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Sovereign and Finance. In contrast, MBBA's top sector exposures are Industrials and Non-Corporate. PINC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.26% for MBBA. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PINC and MBBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PINC vs MBBA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PINC MBBA | +0.12%-0.09% | +0.53%-1.02% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | PINC MBBA | -+$5M | +$25M+$35M | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PINC MBBA | +1.70%+4.75% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PINC MBBA | -0.40%-2.02% | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PINC MBBA | 7d65d | n/an/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
PINC | MBBA | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.54 | |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $48.49 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PINC | MBBA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $48.54 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.10% |
| AuM | $24.84 M | $156.37 M |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.26% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
