PIELvsSCHFETF Comparison
VS
Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. PIEL's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, SCHF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. PIEL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.03% for SCHF. PIEL is up 11.67% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. SCHF performs better with 16.32% YTD performance, and +$4.48B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PIEL and SCHF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PIEL vs SCHF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PIEL SCHF | -4.05%-2.17% | -5.28%-0.77% | +11.67%+16.32% | n/a+24.01% | n/a+73.79% | n/a+62.84% |
| Flows | PIEL SCHF | -+$644M | -+$2.19B | -+$4.48B | -+$6.45B | -+$14.34B | -+$20.96B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PIEL SCHF | +16.75%+13.39% | n/a+15.06% | n/a+14.26% | n/a+15.04% |
| Max drawdown | PIEL SCHF | -7.85%-4.82% | n/a-11.13% | n/a-13.58% | n/a-28.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | PIEL SCHF | 56d51d | n/a65d | n/a211d | n/a830d |
Trading data
PIEL | SCHF | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.48 | $27.73 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $28.16 | $27.97 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PIEL | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PIEL | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.48 | $27.73 |
| 1D performance | +1.12% | -0.86% |
| AuM | $1.13 M | $68.70 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
PIEL | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer International Export Leaders Total Return Index | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 1404 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 22, 2025 | November 3, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
PIEL
Switzerland
16.87%
United Kingdom
12.56%
Japan
10.22%
Republic of Korea
9.65%
France
9.5%
Netherlands
8.19%
Other
33.01%
SCHF
Japan
21.06%
United Kingdom
10.95%
Canada
10.45%
Republic of Korea
8.44%
Switzerland
7.47%
Other
41.62%
Sectors
PIEL
Technology
29.9%
Healthcare
19.77%
Industrials
11.4%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.49%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.61%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.67%
Other
10.16%
SCHF
Finance
28.73%
Technology
15.98%
Industrials
14.45%
Healthcare
7.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.55%
Other
25.35%
Diversification
PIEL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.74%
SCHF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.1%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PIEL
ASML Holding NV
4.92%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.54%
Novartis AG
4.37%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.32%
Roche Holding AG
4.21%
LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
3.69%
AstraZeneca PLC
3.62%
Nestlé SA
3.52%
SAP SE
3.07%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.97%
Hermes International SCA
2.63%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
2.28%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.23%
Safran SA
2.22%
Anheuser-Busch InBev NV
2.15%
SCHF
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.78%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.38%
ASML Holding NV
2.16%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.23%
Roche Holding AG
1.07%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.02%
Novartis AG
1.02%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.89%
Nestlé SA
0.88%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.88%
Shell Plc
0.85%
Siemens AG
0.79%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.74%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
0.71%
Banco Santander SA
0.70%
Frequently asked questions about PIEL and SCHF
How have the PIEL and SCHF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, PIEL is up 11.67% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHF has returned 16.32%. That puts SCHF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PIEL or SCHF?
Year-to-date, the PIEL ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$4.48B for SCHF.
Which ETF is bigger: PIEL or SCHF?
As of September 17, 2026, PIEL holds $1.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHF manages $68.70 B.
What sectors do the PIEL and SCHF ETFs invest in?
PIEL leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, SCHF focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PIEL ETF and SCHF ETF?
PIEL top holdings include ASML Holding NV, SK hynix, Inc. and Novartis AG. SCHF holds in its top three: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SK hynix, Inc. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: PIEL or SCHF?
PIEL holds 97 securities with 50.74% of its assets in the top 15. SCHF has 1429 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.1%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PIEL & SCHF
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
November 1, 2022
SCHF
Advertisement
