Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PIELvsSCHFETF Comparison
Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. PIEL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, SCHF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Information Technology. PIEL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.03% for SCHF. PIEL is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. SCHF performs better with 3.91% YTD performance, and +$862M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PIEL and SCHF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PIEL vs SCHF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PIEL SCHF | -4.92%-5.47% | n/a+5.58% | -0.05%+3.91% | n/a+29.79% | n/a+64.42% | n/a+55.52% |
| Flows | PIEL SCHF | -+$486M | -+$2.35B | -+$862M | -+$3.76B | -+$11.19B | -+$18.82B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PIEL SCHF | n/a+15.20% | n/a+15.58% | n/a+13.40% | n/a+14.45% |
| Max drawdown | PIEL SCHF | n/a-8.50% | n/a-13.56% | n/a-13.58% | n/a-28.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | PIEL SCHF | n/a11d | n/a41d | n/a211d | n/a897d |
PIEL | SCHF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.23 | $24.61 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.23 | $24.88 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PIEL | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PIEL | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $25.23 | $24.61 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -1.09% |
| AuM | $1.01 M | $58.37 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.03% |
PIEL | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer International Export Leaders Total Return Index | FTSE Developed ex US Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 1360 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 22, 2025 | November 3, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PIEL and SCHF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PIEL is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD), while SCHF has returned 3.91%. That puts SCHF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PIEL or SCHF?
Year-to-date, the PIEL ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$862M for SCHF.
Which ETF is bigger: PIEL or SCHF?
As of March 12, 2026, PIEL holds $1.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while SCHF manages $58.37 B.
What sectors do the PIEL and SCHF ETFs invest in?
PIEL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, SCHF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PIEL ETF and SCHF ETF?
PIEL top holdings include SK HYNIX, ASML HOLDING and NOVARTIS. SCHF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ROCHE.
Which ETF is more diversified: PIEL or SCHF?
PIEL holds 98 securities with 54.1% of its assets in the top 15. SCHF has 1431 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.85%.
Should you add international equities to your investment portfolio?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
