Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PIELvsFNDFETF Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF
Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. PIEL's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FNDF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. PIEL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.25% for FNDF. PIEL is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FNDF performs better with 7.55% YTD performance, and +$581M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PIEL and FNDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PIEL vs FNDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PIEL FNDF | -4.92%-5.01% | n/a+9.25% | -0.05%+7.55% | n/a+38.73% | n/a+78.01% | n/a+79.59% |
| Flows | PIEL FNDF | -+$384M | -+$1.13B | -+$581M | -+$2.05B | -+$5.07B | -+$8.74B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PIEL FNDF | n/a+16.20% | n/a+15.58% | n/a+13.58% | n/a+14.47% |
| Max drawdown | PIEL FNDF | n/a-9.15% | n/a-13.78% | n/a-13.78% | n/a-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | PIEL FNDF | n/a11d | n/a44d | n/a44d | n/a545d |
PIEL | FNDF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.85 | $47.97 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.23 | $48.42 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PIEL | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PIEL | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.85 | $47.97 |
| 1D performance | -1.49% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $1.01 M | $21.64 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.25% |
PIEL | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Schwab ETFs |
| Benchmark | Pacer International Export Leaders Total Return Index | RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 821 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 22, 2025 | August 15, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PIEL and FNDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PIEL is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD), while FNDF has returned 7.55%. That puts FNDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PIEL or FNDF?
Year-to-date, the PIEL ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$581M for FNDF.
Which ETF is bigger: PIEL or FNDF?
As of March 12, 2026, PIEL holds $1.01 M in assets under management (AUM), while FNDF manages $21.64 B.
What sectors do the PIEL and FNDF ETFs invest in?
PIEL leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FNDF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PIEL ETF and FNDF ETF?
PIEL top holdings include SK HYNIX, ASML HOLDING and NOVARTIS. FNDF holds in its top three: SAMSUNG ELECTR, SHELL PLC and TOTALENERGIES SE.
Which ETF is more diversified: PIEL or FNDF?
PIEL holds 98 securities with 54.1% of its assets in the top 15. FNDF has 865 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.13%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
