PIELvsEFGETF Comparison
VS
Pacer International Export Leaders ETF (PIEL) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. PIEL's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, EFG's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. PIEL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.34% for EFG. PIEL is up 11.67% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. EFG performs worse with 6.89% YTD performance, and +$6.28B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PIEL and EFG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PIEL vs EFG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PIEL EFG | -4.05%-4.70% | -5.28%-1.89% | +11.67%+6.89% | n/a+9.05% | n/a+42.64% | n/a+17.95% |
| Flows | PIEL EFG | -- | -+$196M | -+$6.28B | -+$2.12B | -+$1.14B | -+$2.79B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PIEL EFG | +16.75%+17.10% | n/a+19.06% | n/a+17.20% | n/a+18.37% |
| Max drawdown | PIEL EFG | -7.85%-6.06% | n/a-12.79% | n/a-16.80% | n/a-35.34% |
| Max drawdown duration | PIEL EFG | 56d35d | n/a92d | n/a232d | n/a1052d |
Trading data
PIEL | EFG | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.48 | $120.15 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $28.16 | $120.63 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PIEL | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PIEL | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.48 | $120.15 |
| 1D performance | +1.12% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $1.13 M | $16.52 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.34% |
Characteristics
PIEL | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Pacer International Export Leaders Total Return Index | MSCI EAFE Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 354 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 22, 2025 | August 1, 2005 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PIEL
Switzerland
16.87%
United Kingdom
12.56%
Japan
10.22%
Republic of Korea
9.65%
France
9.5%
Netherlands
8.19%
Other
33.01%
EFG
Japan
22.47%
United Kingdom
11.43%
Switzerland
10.62%
Netherlands
10.24%
Germany
8.86%
France
7.81%
Other
28.57%
Sectors
PIEL
Technology
29.9%
Healthcare
19.77%
Industrials
11.4%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.49%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.61%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.67%
Other
10.16%
EFG
Industrials
25.56%
Technology
21.54%
Healthcare
12.75%
Finance
12.57%
Other
27.58%
Diversification
PIEL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.74%
EFG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PIEL
ASML Holding NV
4.92%
SK hynix, Inc.
4.54%
Novartis AG
4.37%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
4.32%
Roche Holding AG
4.21%
LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
3.69%
AstraZeneca PLC
3.62%
Nestlé SA
3.52%
SAP SE
3.07%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.97%
Hermes International SCA
2.63%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
2.28%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.23%
Safran SA
2.22%
Anheuser-Busch InBev NV
2.15%
EFG
ASML Holding NV
5.97%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.40%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.94%
SAP SE
1.74%
Schneider Electric SE
1.67%
UBS Group AG
1.56%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
1.53%
Novo Nordisk A/S
1.52%
ABB Ltd.
1.42%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.36%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.35%
Sony Group Corp.
1.30%
Airbus SE
1.29%
Safran SA
1.25%
Siemens Energy AG
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about PIEL and EFG
How have the PIEL and EFG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 17, 2026, PIEL is up 11.67% year-to-date (YTD), while EFG has returned 6.89%. That puts PIEL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PIEL or EFG?
Year-to-date, the PIEL ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$6.28B for EFG.
Which ETF is bigger: PIEL or EFG?
As of September 17, 2026, PIEL holds $1.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFG manages $16.52 B.
What sectors do the PIEL and EFG ETFs invest in?
PIEL leans toward sectors like Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, EFG focuses on Industrials, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PIEL ETF and EFG ETF?
PIEL top holdings include ASML Holding NV, SK hynix, Inc. and Novartis AG. EFG holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, AstraZeneca PLC and Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
Which ETF is more diversified: PIEL or EFG?
PIEL holds 97 securities with 50.74% of its assets in the top 15. EFG has 359 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
