Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PGROvsIWLGETF Comparison
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PGRO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.85% for IWLG. PGRO is down -7.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. IWLG performs better with -6.32% YTD performance, and +$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PGRO and IWLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PGRO vs IWLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PGRO IWLG | -2.63%-1.81% | -6.45%-7.46% | -7.46%-6.32% | +19.14%+17.63% | +96.86%+96.64% | n/an/a |
| Flows | PGRO IWLG | +$2M+$13M | +$7M+$45M | +$4M+$17M | -$9M+$559M | +$6M+$630M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PGRO IWLG | +15.85%+15.59% | +22.40%+22.80% | +19.54%+19.80% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PGRO IWLG | -8.78%-8.96% | -15.18%-16.14% | -23.23%-23.02% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PGRO IWLG | 75d73d | 37d45d | 153d151d | n/an/a |
PGRO | IWLG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.20 | $49.26 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.79 | $49.89 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PGRO | IWLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.20 | $49.26 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -1.26% |
| AuM | $63.98 M | $639.50 M |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.85% |
PGRO | IWLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Putnam | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 37 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 25, 2021 | June 23, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PGRO and IWLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, PGRO is down -7.46% year-to-date (YTD), while IWLG has lost -6.32%. That puts IWLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PGRO or IWLG?
Year-to-date, the PGRO ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$17M for IWLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: PGRO or IWLG?
Over the past year, PGRO had a volatility of 22.4%, while IWLG experienced 22.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: PGRO or IWLG?
As of March 13, 2026, PGRO holds $63.98 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWLG manages $639.50 M.
What sectors do the PGRO and IWLG ETFs invest in?
PGRO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PGRO ETF and IWLG ETF?
PGRO top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PGRO or IWLG?
PGRO holds 34 securities with 75.37% of its assets in the top 15. IWLG has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.07%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
