PGJvsNBCEETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. Neuberger Berman China Equity ETF (NBCE) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. PGJ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, NBCE's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. PGJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 5.01% for NBCE. PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$23M in YTD flows. NBCE performs better with 1.17% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PGJ and NBCE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PGJ vs NBCE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PGJ NBCE | -4.13%-8.66% | -11.49%-14.52% | -25.60%+1.17% | -33.97%+2.06% | -7.15%+48.70% | -47.19%n/a |
| Flows | PGJ NBCE | -$4M- | -$5M+$985K | -$23M+$6M | -$34M+$8M | -$60M+$12M | -$13M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PGJ NBCE | +19.45%+19.19% | +22.94%+22.87% | +30.12%+21.54% | +42.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PGJ NBCE | -18.23%-18.81% | -34.39%-26.94% | -36.97%-26.94% | -61.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PGJ NBCE | 77d70d | 364d126d | 389d126d | 1805dn/a |
Trading data
PGJ | NBCE | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.21 | $33.46 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $21.22 | $33.79 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBCE
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPGJ | NBCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PGJ | NBCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.21 | $33.46 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.95% |
| AuM | $77.77 M | $15.60 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 5.01% |
Characteristics
PGJ | NBCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Neuberger Berman |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 70 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 9, 2004 | October 16, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PGJ
China
98.87%
Other
1.13%
NBCE
China
92.02%
Other
7.98%
Sectors
PGJ
Technology
32.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
20.82%
Consumer Services
16.02%
Consumer Cyclical.
15.8%
Industrials
8.77%
Other
6.34%
NBCE
Technology
35.29%
Finance
15.01%
Industrials
15%
Non-Energy Materi.
12.8%
Other
21.9%
Advertisement
Diversification
PGJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.13%
NBCE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.63%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PGJ
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
8.83%
JD.com, Inc.
8.24%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.81%
NetEase, Inc.
6.54%
Baidu, Inc.
5.98%
Kanzhun Ltd.
4.66%
H World Group Ltd.
4.38%
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc.
4.02%
Maase, Inc.
3.95%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.83%
Vipshop Holdings Ltd.
3.71%
TAL Education Group
3.26%
NIO, Inc.
3.25%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
3.13%
KE Holdings, Inc.
2.55%
NBCE
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
4.34%
Montage Technology Co., Ltd.
3.51%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
3.28%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
3.14%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
2.79%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
2.69%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
2.42%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
2.39%
Chaozhou Three-Circle (Group) Co., Ltd.
2.17%
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
2.13%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
2.01%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.97%
Weichai Power Co., Ltd.
1.95%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
1.93%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
1.92%
Frequently asked questions about PGJ and NBCE
How have the PGJ and NBCE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD), while NBCE has returned 1.17%. That puts NBCE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PGJ or NBCE?
Year-to-date, the PGJ ETF saw -$23M in flows, compared to +$6M for NBCE.
Which ETF is more volatile: PGJ or NBCE?
Over the past year, PGJ had a volatility of 22.94%, while NBCE experienced 22.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: PGJ or NBCE?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ holds $77.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while NBCE manages $15.60 M.
What sectors do the PGJ and NBCE ETFs invest in?
PGJ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, NBCE focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PGJ ETF and NBCE ETF?
PGJ top holdings include Yum China Holdings, Inc., JD.com, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. NBCE holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Montage Technology Co., Ltd. and Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PGJ or NBCE?
PGJ holds 68 securities with 74.13% of its assets in the top 15. NBCE has 70 securities and a top 15 weight of 38.63%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
