PGJvsJCHIETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. PGJ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, JCHI's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. PGJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.65% for JCHI. PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$23M in YTD flows. JCHI performs better with -11.11% YTD performance, and +$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PGJ and JCHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PGJ vs JCHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PGJ JCHI | -4.13%-5.58% | -11.49%-10.65% | -25.60%-11.11% | -33.97%-16.02% | -7.15%+28.57% | -47.19%n/a |
| Flows | PGJ JCHI | -$4M+$1M | -$5M+$1M | -$23M+$1M | -$34M+$1M | -$60M+$2M | -$13M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PGJ JCHI | +19.45%+13.89% | +22.94%+17.00% | +30.12%+22.38% | +42.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PGJ JCHI | -18.23%-14.63% | -34.39%-17.30% | -36.97%-23.92% | -61.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PGJ JCHI | 77d77d | 364d364d | 389d318d | 1805dn/a |
Trading data
PGJ | JCHI | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.21 | $48.13 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $21.22 | $48.45 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JCHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPGJ | JCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PGJ | JCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.21 | $48.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.66% |
| AuM | $77.77 M | $14.62 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
PGJ | JCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 48 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 9, 2004 | March 16, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PGJ
China
98.87%
Other
1.13%
JCHI
China
99.37%
Other
0.63%
Sectors
PGJ
Technology
32.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
20.82%
Consumer Services
16.02%
Consumer Cyclical.
15.8%
Industrials
8.77%
Other
6.34%
JCHI
Technology
31.32%
Finance
21.05%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.63%
Industrials
9.04%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.21%
Other
18.75%
Advertisement
Diversification
PGJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.13%
JCHI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PGJ
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
8.83%
JD.com, Inc.
8.24%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.81%
NetEase, Inc.
6.54%
Baidu, Inc.
5.98%
Kanzhun Ltd.
4.66%
H World Group Ltd.
4.38%
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc.
4.02%
Maase, Inc.
3.95%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.83%
Vipshop Holdings Ltd.
3.71%
TAL Education Group
3.26%
NIO, Inc.
3.25%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
3.13%
KE Holdings, Inc.
2.55%
JCHI
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
11.30%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.67%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
4.60%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
4.44%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
4.10%
China Construction Bank Corp.
3.43%
NetEase, Inc.
3.30%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
2.92%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
2.62%
CITIC Securities Co., Ltd.
2.42%
Fuyao Glass Industry Group Co., Ltd.
2.42%
Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
2.40%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.32%
China International Capital Corp. Ltd.
2.27%
Meituan
2.25%
Frequently asked questions about PGJ and JCHI
How have the PGJ and JCHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD), while JCHI has lost -11.11%. That puts JCHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PGJ or JCHI?
Year-to-date, the PGJ ETF saw -$23M in flows, compared to +$1M for JCHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: PGJ or JCHI?
Over the past year, PGJ had a volatility of 22.94%, while JCHI experienced 17%.
Which ETF is bigger: PGJ or JCHI?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ holds $77.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while JCHI manages $14.62 M.
What sectors do the PGJ and JCHI ETFs invest in?
PGJ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, JCHI focuses on Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the PGJ ETF and JCHI ETF?
PGJ top holdings include Yum China Holdings, Inc., JD.com, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. JCHI holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PGJ or JCHI?
PGJ holds 68 securities with 74.13% of its assets in the top 15. JCHI has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.46%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PGJ & JCHI
Advertisement
