PGJvsCXSEETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
This fund is part of
China Blended Cap
-0.48%
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. PGJ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, CXSE's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. PGJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.32% for CXSE. PGJ is down -25.68% year-to-date (YTD) with -$23M in YTD flows. CXSE performs better with -20.25% YTD performance, and -$17M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PGJ and CXSE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PGJ vs CXSE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PGJ CXSE | -4.23%-9.56% | -11.58%-15.82% | -25.68%-20.25% | -34.04%-25.60% | -7.33%+15.97% | -46.87%-38.48% |
| Flows | PGJ CXSE | -$4M-$34M | -$5M-$34M | -$23M-$17M | -$34M-$17M | -$60M-$211M | -$13M-$62M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PGJ CXSE | +19.30%+18.29% | +22.90%+20.96% | +30.12%+24.46% | +42.06%+28.01% |
| Max drawdown | PGJ CXSE | -18.23%-18.35% | -34.39%-25.65% | -36.97%-28.08% | -61.15%-57.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | PGJ CXSE | 78d78d | 365d365d | 390d390d | 1806d1806d |
Trading data
PGJ | CXSE | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $20.83 | $32.20 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $21.21 | $31.97 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PGJ | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PGJ | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $20.83 | $32.20 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | +0.72% |
| AuM | $77.68 M | $377.57 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
PGJ | CXSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index | WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 248 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 9, 2004 | September 19, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PGJ
China
98.87%
Other
1.13%
CXSE
China
90.61%
Other
9.39%
Sectors
PGJ
Technology
32.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
20.82%
Consumer Services
16.02%
Consumer Cyclical.
15.8%
Industrials
8.77%
Other
6.34%
CXSE
Technology
35.03%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
16.23%
Industrials
12.36%
Healthcare
10.6%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.11%
Other
16.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
PGJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.13%
CXSE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.31%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PGJ
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
8.83%
JD.com, Inc.
8.24%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.81%
NetEase, Inc.
6.54%
Baidu, Inc.
5.98%
Kanzhun Ltd.
4.66%
H World Group Ltd.
4.38%
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc.
4.02%
Maase, Inc.
3.95%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.83%
Vipshop Holdings Ltd.
3.71%
TAL Education Group
3.26%
NIO, Inc.
3.25%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
3.13%
KE Holdings, Inc.
2.55%
CXSE
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
7.61%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.55%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
4.62%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
3.62%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
2.54%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.24%
PDD Holdings, Inc.
2.14%
Xiaomi Corp.
2.03%
Meituan
1.77%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
1.77%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
1.65%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
1.52%
NetEase, Inc.
1.46%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.45%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
1.36%
Frequently asked questions about PGJ and CXSE
How have the PGJ and CXSE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, PGJ is down -25.68% year-to-date (YTD), while CXSE has lost -20.25%. That puts CXSE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PGJ or CXSE?
Year-to-date, the PGJ ETF saw -$23M in flows, compared to -$17M for CXSE.
Which ETF is more volatile: PGJ or CXSE?
Over the past year, PGJ had a volatility of 22.9%, while CXSE experienced 20.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: PGJ or CXSE?
As of October 27, 2026, PGJ holds $77.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while CXSE manages $377.57 M.
What sectors do the PGJ and CXSE ETFs invest in?
PGJ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, CXSE focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PGJ ETF and CXSE ETF?
PGJ top holdings include Yum China Holdings, Inc., JD.com, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. CXSE holds in its top three: Tencent Holdings Ltd., Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PGJ or CXSE?
PGJ holds 68 securities with 74.13% of its assets in the top 15. CXSE has 260 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.31%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
