PGJvsCNQQETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) belongs to the China Blended Cap segment. Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ) is part of the EM Awakening segment. PGJ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, CNQQ's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. PGJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.75% for CNQQ. PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$23M in YTD flows. CNQQ performs better with -16.85% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PGJ and CNQQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PGJ vs CNQQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PGJ CNQQ | -4.13%-11.68% | -11.49%-21.00% | -25.60%-16.85% | -33.97%-22.38% | -7.15%n/a | -47.19%n/a |
| Flows | PGJ CNQQ | -$4M-$3M | -$5M-$2M | -$23M+$33M | -$34M+$40M | -$60M- | -$13M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PGJ CNQQ | +19.45%+24.22% | +22.94%+25.94% | +30.12%n/a | +42.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PGJ CNQQ | -18.23%-23.06% | -34.39%-28.61% | -36.97%n/a | -61.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PGJ CNQQ | 77d70d | 364d118d | 389dn/a | 1805dn/a |
Trading data
PGJ | CNQQ | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.21 | $18.96 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $21.22 | $19.26 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PGJ | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PGJ | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.21 | $18.96 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -1.56% |
| AuM | $77.77 M | $36.54 M |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
PGJ | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Rayliant Asset Management |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index | Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 100 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 9, 2004 | September 25, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PGJ
China
98.87%
Other
1.13%
CNQQ
China
99.21%
Other
0.79%
Sectors
PGJ
Technology
32.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
20.82%
Consumer Services
16.02%
Consumer Cyclical.
15.8%
Industrials
8.77%
Other
6.34%
CNQQ
Technology
56.89%
Industrials
14.4%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.31%
Healthcare
7.23%
Other
11.17%
Advertisement
Diversification
PGJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.13%
CNQQ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.29%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PGJ
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
8.83%
JD.com, Inc.
8.24%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.81%
NetEase, Inc.
6.54%
Baidu, Inc.
5.98%
Kanzhun Ltd.
4.66%
H World Group Ltd.
4.38%
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc.
4.02%
Maase, Inc.
3.95%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.83%
Vipshop Holdings Ltd.
3.71%
TAL Education Group
3.26%
NIO, Inc.
3.25%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
3.13%
KE Holdings, Inc.
2.55%
CNQQ
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.79%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
8.42%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
6.16%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
5.71%
Xiaomi Corp.
3.31%
Meituan
2.97%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
2.67%
NetEase, Inc.
2.33%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
2.08%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.08%
Advanced Micro Fabrication Equipment, Inc. China
1.93%
GigaDevice Semiconductor, Inc.
1.92%
Hygon Information Technology Co., Ltd.
1.70%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.64%
Montage Technology Co., Ltd.
1.59%
Frequently asked questions about PGJ and CNQQ
How have the PGJ and CNQQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD), while CNQQ has lost -16.85%. That puts CNQQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PGJ or CNQQ?
Year-to-date, the PGJ ETF saw -$23M in flows, compared to +$33M for CNQQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: PGJ or CNQQ?
Over the past year, PGJ had a volatility of 22.94%, while CNQQ experienced 25.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: PGJ or CNQQ?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ holds $77.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while CNQQ manages $36.54 M.
What sectors do the PGJ and CNQQ ETFs invest in?
PGJ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, CNQQ focuses on Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the PGJ ETF and CNQQ ETF?
PGJ top holdings include Yum China Holdings, Inc., JD.com, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. CNQQ holds in its top three: Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PGJ or CNQQ?
PGJ holds 68 securities with 74.13% of its assets in the top 15. CNQQ has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.29%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
