PGJvsASHRETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) belong to the same industry segment: China Blended Cap. PGJ's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. In contrast, ASHR's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. PGJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.65% for ASHR. PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD) with -$23M in YTD flows. ASHR performs better with -6.07% YTD performance, and -$420M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PGJ and ASHR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PGJ vs ASHR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/26/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PGJ ASHR | -4.13%-4.80% | -11.49%-11.08% | -25.60%-6.07% | -33.97%-5.67% | -7.15%+34.47% | -47.19%-15.13% |
| Flows | PGJ ASHR | -$4M-$5M | -$5M-$104M | -$23M-$420M | -$34M-$374M | -$60M-$749M | -$13M-$163M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PGJ ASHR | +19.45%+15.12% | +22.94%+17.68% | +30.12%+21.88% | +42.06%+20.76% |
| Max drawdown | PGJ ASHR | -18.23%-13.78% | -34.39%-18.35% | -36.97%-30.96% | -61.15%-43.53% |
| Max drawdown duration | PGJ ASHR | 77d70d | 364d126d | 389d505d | 1805d1778d |
Trading data
PGJ | ASHR | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.21 | $30.78 |
| Previous close 10/26/2026 | $21.22 | $30.94 |
| Consolidated volume 10/26/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PGJ | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PGJ | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.21 | $30.78 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $77.77 M | $1.31 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
PGJ | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index | CSI 300 Index |
| N° of holdings | 68 | 284 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 9, 2004 | November 5, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PGJ
China
98.87%
Other
1.13%
ASHR
China
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
PGJ
Technology
32.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
20.82%
Consumer Services
16.02%
Consumer Cyclical.
15.8%
Industrials
8.77%
Other
6.34%
ASHR
Technology
29.13%
Finance
20.09%
Industrials
17.95%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.67%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.81%
Other
13.35%
Advertisement
Diversification
PGJ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.13%
ASHR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.35%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PGJ
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
8.83%
JD.com, Inc.
8.24%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
7.81%
NetEase, Inc.
6.54%
Baidu, Inc.
5.98%
Kanzhun Ltd.
4.66%
H World Group Ltd.
4.38%
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc.
4.02%
Maase, Inc.
3.95%
Full Truck Alliance Co., Ltd.
3.83%
Vipshop Holdings Ltd.
3.71%
TAL Education Group
3.26%
NIO, Inc.
3.25%
Tencent Music Entertainment Group
3.13%
KE Holdings, Inc.
2.55%
ASHR
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.75%
Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd.
3.68%
Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd.
3.12%
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd.
2.29%
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
2.21%
Eoptolink Technology Inc., Ltd.
2.15%
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd.
1.89%
Midea Group Co. Ltd.
1.64%
WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd.
1.50%
China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd.
1.33%
Cambricon Technologies Corp. Ltd.
1.28%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
1.19%
Industrial Bank Co., Ltd.
1.14%
Luxshare Precision Industry Co., Ltd.
1.12%
CITIC Securities Co., Ltd.
1.08%
Frequently asked questions about PGJ and ASHR
How have the PGJ and ASHR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ is down -25.6% year-to-date (YTD), while ASHR has lost -6.07%. That puts ASHR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PGJ or ASHR?
Year-to-date, the PGJ ETF saw -$23M in flows, compared to -$420M for ASHR.
Which ETF is more volatile: PGJ or ASHR?
Over the past year, PGJ had a volatility of 22.94%, while ASHR experienced 17.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: PGJ or ASHR?
As of October 26, 2026, PGJ holds $77.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while ASHR manages $1.31 B.
What sectors do the PGJ and ASHR ETFs invest in?
PGJ leans toward sectors like Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Consumer Services. Meanwhile, ASHR focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PGJ ETF and ASHR ETF?
PGJ top holdings include Yum China Holdings, Inc., JD.com, Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.. ASHR holds in its top three: Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd., Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd. and Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PGJ or ASHR?
PGJ holds 68 securities with 74.13% of its assets in the top 15. ASHR has 284 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.35%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PGJ & ASHR
Advertisement
