Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PFMvsILCVETF Comparison
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF (PFM) belongs to the US High Dividend segment. iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. PFM's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, ILCV's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. PFM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.04% for ILCV. PFM is up 1.63% year-to-date (YTD) with -$22M in YTD flows. ILCV performs worse with 0.84% YTD performance, and +$113K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PFM and ILCV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PFM vs ILCV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PFM ILCV | -3.35%-2.94% | +0.36%-0.05% | +1.63%+0.84% | +16.55%+20.46% | +56.72%+65.51% | +68.54%+74.64% |
| Flows | PFM ILCV | -$5M+$19M | -$12M+$13M | -$22M+$113K | -$38M+$32M | -$179M+$16M | -$94M+$144M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PFM ILCV | +9.32%+9.34% | +14.60%+15.49% | +11.90%+12.64% | +13.51%+14.39% |
| Max drawdown | PFM ILCV | -3.35%-3.00% | -11.22%-12.22% | -14.65%-15.16% | -17.94%-18.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | PFM ILCV | 28d31d | 46d77d | 128d132d | 561d561d |
PFM | ILCV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $52.28 | $95.13 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $52.41 | $95.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PFM | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PFM | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.28 | $95.13 |
| 1D performance | -0.25% | -0.24% |
| AuM | $744.02 M | $1.18 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.04% |
PFM | ILCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | iShares |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index | Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 421 | 360 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 15, 2005 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PFM and ILCV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PFM is up 1.63% year-to-date (YTD), while ILCV has returned 0.84%. That puts PFM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PFM or ILCV?
Year-to-date, the PFM ETF saw -$22M in flows, compared to +$113K for ILCV.
Which ETF is more volatile: PFM or ILCV?
Over the past year, PFM had a volatility of 14.6%, while ILCV experienced 15.49%.
Which ETF is bigger: PFM or ILCV?
As of March 11, 2026, PFM holds $744.02 M in assets under management (AUM), while ILCV manages $1.18 B.
What sectors do the PFM and ILCV ETFs invest in?
PFM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, ILCV focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PFM ETF and ILCV ETF?
PFM top holdings include LILLY, MICROSOFT-T and WALMART INC. ILCV holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and BERKSHIRE HATHWAY.
Which ETF is more diversified: PFM or ILCV?
PFM holds 426 securities with 37.61% of its assets in the top 15. ILCV has 382 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.66%.
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.