Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PDPvsGFLWETF Comparison
Invesco DWA Momentum ETF (PDP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. PDP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, GFLW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials. PDP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.5% for GFLW. PDP is up 3.61% year-to-date (YTD) with -$39M in YTD flows. GFLW performs worse with -5.08% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PDP and GFLW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PDP vs GFLW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PDP GFLW | -4.87%-2.02% | +3.67%-5.05% | +3.61%-5.08% | +24.54%+24.43% | +68.50%n/a | +39.95%n/a |
| Flows | PDP GFLW | -$23M+$40M | -$38M+$49M | -$39M+$47M | -$151M+$298M | -$308M- | -$862M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PDP GFLW | +24.30%+19.14% | +23.82%+24.35% | +19.87%n/a | +21.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PDP GFLW | -7.63%-8.23% | -15.20%-15.76% | -23.82%n/a | -33.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PDP GFLW | 16d65d | 50d37d | 284dn/a | 976dn/a |
PDP | GFLW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $120.54 | $26.75 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $121.25 | $26.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PDP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PDP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $120.54 | $26.75 |
| 1D performance | -0.59% | -0.02% |
| AuM | $1.29 B | $652.56 M |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.5% |
PDP | GFLW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index | Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 89 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2007 | December 4, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PDP and GFLW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, PDP is up 3.61% year-to-date (YTD), while GFLW has lost -5.08%. That puts PDP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PDP or GFLW?
Year-to-date, the PDP ETF saw -$39M in flows, compared to +$47M for GFLW.
Which ETF is more volatile: PDP or GFLW?
Over the past year, PDP had a volatility of 23.82%, while GFLW experienced 24.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: PDP or GFLW?
As of March 13, 2026, PDP holds $1.29 B in assets under management (AUM), while GFLW manages $652.56 M.
What sectors do the PDP and GFLW ETFs invest in?
PDP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GFLW focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PDP ETF and GFLW ETF?
PDP top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, AMPHENOL and APPLE. GFLW holds in its top three: US5128073062, KLA CORPORATION and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: PDP or GFLW?
PDP holds 100 securities with 31.97% of its assets in the top 15. GFLW has 91 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.28%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
