Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PDPvsFTGSETF Comparison
Invesco DWA Momentum ETF (PDP) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. PDP's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, FTGS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. PDP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.62%, versus 0.6% for FTGS. PDP is up 4.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$37M in YTD flows. FTGS performs worse with -1.86% YTD performance, and -$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PDP and FTGS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PDP vs FTGS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PDP FTGS | -2.90%-0.59% | +3.13%-2.55% | +4.17%-1.86% | +22.50%+18.05% | +69.41%+67.88% | +42.65%n/a |
| Flows | PDP FTGS | -$21M-$29M | -$35M-$12M | -$37M-$28M | -$149M+$47M | -$305M+$1.06B | -$866M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PDP FTGS | +24.38%+14.31% | +23.92%+19.83% | +19.88%+16.67% | +21.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PDP FTGS | -7.13%-5.19% | -15.20%-13.23% | -23.82%-20.04% | -33.94%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PDP FTGS | 15d45d | 50d37d | 284d112d | 976dn/a |
PDP | FTGS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:07 PM | $122.60 | $34.56 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $121.25 | $34.66 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PDP | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PDP | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $122.60 | $34.56 |
| 1D performance | +1.11% | -0.29% |
| AuM | $1.30 B | $1.21 B |
| E/R | 0.62% | 0.6% |
PDP | FTGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | First Trust |
| Benchmark | Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index | The Growth Strength Index |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 50 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2007 | October 26, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PDP and FTGS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PDP is up 4.17% year-to-date (YTD), while FTGS has lost -1.86%. That puts PDP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PDP or FTGS?
Year-to-date, the PDP ETF saw -$37M in flows, compared to -$28M for FTGS.
Which ETF is more volatile: PDP or FTGS?
Over the past year, PDP had a volatility of 23.92%, while FTGS experienced 19.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: PDP or FTGS?
As of March 12, 2026, PDP holds $1.30 B in assets under management (AUM), while FTGS manages $1.21 B.
What sectors do the PDP and FTGS ETFs invest in?
PDP leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, FTGS focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PDP ETF and FTGS ETF?
PDP top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, AMPHENOL and APPLE. FTGS holds in its top three: META PLATFORMS, MICRON TECHNOLOGY and US0404132054.
Which ETF is more diversified: PDP or FTGS?
PDP holds 100 securities with 31.97% of its assets in the top 15. FTGS has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.3%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
