PCSvsSPIBETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
SPIB
State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
This fund is part of
US Corporate IG Bonds
+0.03%
PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) belongs to the Intl IG Bonds segment. State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPIB) is part of the US Corporate IG Bonds segment. PCS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, SPIB's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Utilities. PCS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.04% for SPIB. PCS is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$509M in YTD flows. SPIB performs worse with -0.62% YTD performance, and +$786M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PCS and SPIB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PCS vs SPIB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PCS SPIB | +0.14%+0.03% | -0.21%-1.24% | +0.95%-0.62% | +1.81%-0.15% | n/a+18.75% | n/a+8.23% |
| Flows | PCS SPIB | +$41M+$122M | +$64M+$138M | +$509M+$786M | +$547M+$989M | -+$4.53B | -+$6.03B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PCS SPIB | +1.67%+3.06% | +1.54%+2.79% | n/a+3.39% | n/a+4.20% |
| Max drawdown | PCS SPIB | -1.21%-2.38% | -1.21%-2.77% | n/a-2.77% | n/a-13.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | PCS SPIB | 51d52d | 51d229d | n/a229d | n/a998d |
Trading data
PCS | SPIB | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.26 | $32.47 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $49.23 | $32.47 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PCS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPCS | SPIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PCS | SPIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.26 | $32.47 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $674.59 M | $11.35 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
PCS | SPIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | PGIM | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg U.S. Intermediate Corporate Bond Index |
| N° of holdings | 280 | 5185 |
| Asset class | - | Bonds |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 29, 2025 | February 10, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PCS
USA
81.47%
Other
18.53%
SPIB
USA
80.24%
Other
19.76%
Sectors
PCS
Finance
40.52%
Utilities
9.68%
Industrials
8.94%
Energy
7.53%
Other
33.33%
SPIB
Finance
41.01%
Technology
8.69%
Utilities
8.28%
Other
42.02%
Advertisement
Diversification
PCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.28%
SPIB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
3.62%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PCS
JP Morgan, 5.581% 22apr2030, USD
2.10%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.087% 14jun2029, USD (N)
1.92%
Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., 5.504% 26may2028, USD (A)
1.65%
Goldman Sachs, 4.369% 21oct2031, USD
1.60%
Citigroup, 4.952% 7may2031, USD
1.55%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31mar2028, USD (AZ-2028)
1.39%
Goldman Sachs, 2.64% 24feb2028, USD
1.30%
Morgan Stanley, 2.699% 22jan2031, USD (I)
1.29%
Philip Morris International, 4.375% 1nov2027, USD
1.19%
Spirit AeroSystems, 4.6% 15jun2028, USD
1.19%
Southern California Edison, 5.3% 1mar2028, USD (2023A)
1.10%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc., 4.9% 15dec2030, USD
1.02%
Wells Fargo, 4.97% 23apr2029, USD (W)
1.01%
Cigna Group, 2.4% 15mar2030, USD
1.01%
JP Morgan, 4.995% 22jul2030, USD
0.98%
SPIB
Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., 5.016% 12jan2029, USD (A)
0.43%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 4.847% 27jul2029, USD (F)
0.32%
Amazon.com, 4.8% 9jul2031, USD
0.30%
Royal Bank of Canada, 4.95% 5aug2032, USD
0.27%
US00287YEK10
0.24%
US404280FS32
0.23%
US69371RU617
0.22%
JP Morgan, 5.193% 5feb2037, USD
0.21%
Broadcom Inc, 4.35% 15feb2030, USD
0.21%
Accenture, 4.75% 10jul2029, USD
0.21%
Citigroup, 5.411% 19sep2039, USD
0.20%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.875% 15jul2036, USD
0.20%
Citibank N.A., 4.846% 18jun2032, USD
0.20%
US63743HGH93
0.20%
NVIDIA, 4.5% 15jun2031, USD
0.19%
Frequently asked questions about PCS and SPIB
How have the PCS and SPIB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, PCS is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while SPIB has lost -0.62%. That puts PCS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PCS or SPIB?
Year-to-date, the PCS ETF saw +$509M in flows, compared to +$786M for SPIB.
Which ETF is more volatile: PCS or SPIB?
Over the past year, PCS had a volatility of 1.54%, while SPIB experienced 2.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: PCS or SPIB?
As of October 15, 2026, PCS holds $674.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while SPIB manages $11.35 B.
What sectors do the PCS and SPIB ETFs invest in?
PCS leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, SPIB focuses on Finance, Technology and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the PCS ETF and SPIB ETF?
PCS top holdings include JP Morgan, 5.581% 22apr2030, USD, Bank of America Corporation, 2.087% 14jun2029, USD (N) and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., 5.504% 26may2028, USD (A). SPIB holds in its top three: Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., 5.016% 12jan2029, USD (A), Toronto-Dominion Bank, 4.847% 27jul2029, USD (F) and Amazon.com, 4.8% 9jul2031, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: PCS or SPIB?
PCS holds 297 securities with 20.28% of its assets in the top 15. SPIB has 5309 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.62%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
