PCMMvsJABSETF Comparison
BondBloxx Private Credit CLO ETF (PCMM) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. Both ETFs have the same top 2 sector exposures: Industrials and Finance. PCMM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.68%, versus 0.34% for JABS. PCMM is up 4.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$73M in YTD flows. JABS performs worse with 1.95% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PCMM and JABS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PCMM vs JABS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PCMM JABS | +0.53%+0.07% | +1.51%+0.14% | +4.15%+1.95% | +5.05%+2.95% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | PCMM JABS | +$49M+$38M | +$63M+$43M | +$73M+$47M | +$88M+$47M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PCMM JABS | +0.26%+1.33% | +1.10%+1.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PCMM JABS | n/a-0.86% | -1.15%-1.06% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PCMM JABS | n/a50d | 75d67d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
PCMM | JABS | |
Last sale 10/15/2026 at 2:57 PM | $49.91 | $49.50 |
| Previous close 10/14/2026 | $49.93 | $49.47 |
| Consolidated volume 10/14/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PCMM | JABS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.91 | $49.50 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.06% |
| AuM | $257.61 M | $176.38 M |
| E/R | 0.68% | 0.34% |
PCMM | JABS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Bondbloxx Investment Management LLC | Janus Henderson Investors |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 10 | 71 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2024 | July 23, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
