PCEFvsFTMHETF Comparison
VS
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH) is part of the Municipal Bonds segment. PCEF's top 1 sector exposures are Non-Corporate. In contrast, FTMH's top sector exposures are Municipal. PCEF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.76%, versus 0.35% for FTMH. PCEF is up 5.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$31M in YTD flows. FTMH performs worse with -3.06% YTD performance, and +$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PCEF and FTMH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PCEF vs FTMH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PCEF FTMH | -1.78%-3.74% | +2.36%-4.88% | +5.77%-3.06% | +7.18%n/a | +45.25%n/a | +24.27%n/a |
| Flows | PCEF FTMH | -$1M+$12M | -$20M+$9M | -$31M+$45M | -$44M- | +$38M- | +$14M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PCEF FTMH | +7.95%+4.79% | +9.03%n/a | +10.28%n/a | +11.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PCEF FTMH | -2.68%-6.01% | -8.38%n/a | -14.10%n/a | -24.29%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PCEF FTMH | 19d72d | 63dn/a | 124dn/a | 1015dn/a |
Trading data
PCEF | FTMH | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 3:50 PM | $19.98 | $11.20 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $19.94 | $11.15 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FTMH
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPCEF | FTMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 3:50 PM
Live
Closed
PCEF | FTMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.98 | $11.20 |
| 1D performance | +0.20% | +0.40% |
| AuM | $796.61 M | $562.28 M |
| E/R | 2.76% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
PCEF | FTMH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 106 | 96 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 19, 2010 | October 24, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PCEF
USA
100%
Other
0%
FTMH
USA
26.88%
Other
73.12%
Sectors
PCEF
Non-Corporate
100%
Other
0%
FTMH
Municipal
26.88%
Other
73.12%
Advertisement
Diversification
PCEF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.26%
FTMH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.99%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PCEF
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund
4.41%
Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
4.26%
BlackRock Science & Technology Term Trust
2.77%
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund
2.73%
BlackRock Enhanced Equity Dividend Trust
2.57%
Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund
2.57%
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Buy Write Opportunities Fund
2.46%
BlackRock Corporate High Yield Fund, Inc.
2.44%
BlackRock Science & Technology Trust
2.34%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund
2.12%
Virtus Dividend Interest & Premium Strategy Fund
2.08%
Nuveen Floating Rate Income Fund /CEF/
2.04%
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
2.03%
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Global Buy Write Opportunities Fund
1.75%
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
1.72%
FTMH
New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2055, USD (2025)
1.65%
CSCDA Community Improvement Authority, 3.125% 1aug2056, USD (2021A-2)
1.29%
US389526AJ35
1.00%
Puerto Rico, 4% 1jul2041, USD
0.99%
US57420VSP93
0.97%
Illinois Finance Authority, 5% 15feb2047, USD (2017A)
0.96%
Detroit, 4% 1apr2044, USD
0.89%
US650116GY64
0.84%
Chicago Board of Education, 5.75% 1dec2050, USD (2025A)
0.84%
New York Liberty Development Corp., 3% 15sep2043, USD (2015B)
0.81%
New York Transportation Development Corp., 4% 1jan2036, USD (2018)
0.80%
US51404PAK57
0.77%
Kentucky Public Energy Authority, 5% 1dec2033, USD (2025)
0.74%
US88035RDN17
0.73%
US88035UPA96
0.72%
Frequently asked questions about PCEF and FTMH
How have the PCEF and FTMH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, PCEF is up 5.77% year-to-date (YTD), while FTMH has lost -3.06%. That puts PCEF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PCEF or FTMH?
Year-to-date, the PCEF ETF saw -$31M in flows, compared to +$45M for FTMH.
Which ETF is bigger: PCEF or FTMH?
As of September 10, 2026, PCEF holds $796.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while FTMH manages $562.28 M.
What sectors do the PCEF and FTMH ETFs invest in?
PCEF leans toward sectors like Non-Corporate. Meanwhile, FTMH focuses on Municipal.
What are the top holdings of the PCEF ETF and FTMH ETF?
PCEF top holdings include Eaton Vance Tax Managed Global Diversified Equity Income Fund, Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund and BlackRock Science & Technology Term Trust. FTMH holds in its top three: New York Transportation Development Corp., 6% 30jun2055, USD (2025), CSCDA Community Improvement Authority, 3.125% 1aug2056, USD (2021A-2) and US389526AJ35.
Which ETF is more diversified: PCEF or FTMH?
PCEF holds 106 securities with 38.26% of its assets in the top 15. FTMH has 495 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.99%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
