PBWvsNUKZETF Comparison
VS
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. PBW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, NUKZ's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. PBW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.63%, versus 0.85% for NUKZ. PBW is down -18.46% year-to-date (YTD) with -$324M in YTD flows. NUKZ performs better with -10.43% YTD performance, and -$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBW and NUKZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PBW vs NUKZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBW NUKZ | -19.32%-10.14% | -25.46%-12.09% | -18.46%-10.43% | -22.53%-14.12% | -0.07%n/a | -66.91%n/a |
| Flows | PBW NUKZ | -$3M-$31M | -$33M-$74M | -$324M-$22M | -$217M+$7M | -$136M- | -$401M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBW NUKZ | +37.23%+23.95% | +42.12%+27.01% | +41.22%n/a | +43.37%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PBW NUKZ | -29.34%-16.43% | -46.97%-24.75% | -54.99%n/a | -84.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PBW NUKZ | 68d67d | 143d169d | 644dn/a | 1810dn/a |
Trading data
PBW | NUKZ | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.56 | $56.25 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $24.54 | $56.62 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PBW | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PBW | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.56 | $56.25 |
| 1D performance | +0.08% | -0.65% |
| AuM | $283.99 M | $622.73 M |
| E/R | 0.63% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
PBW | NUKZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Exchange Traded Concepts |
| Benchmark | WilderHill Clean Energy Index | VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index |
| N° of holdings | 71 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | January 23, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PBW
USA
76.66%
Other
23.34%
NUKZ
USA
50.95%
Canada
11.18%
Republic of Korea
10.22%
Japan
7.56%
Other
20.08%
Sectors
PBW
Industrials
42.5%
Non-Energy Materi.
25.6%
Technology
11.01%
Consumer Cyclical.
10.61%
Other
10.28%
NUKZ
Industrials
50.89%
Utilities
31.93%
Energy
10.35%
Other
6.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.12%
NUKZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.21%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PBW
BETA Technologies, Inc.
2.54%
OPAL Fuels, Inc.
2.18%
Itron, Inc.
2.16%
Gevo, Inc.
2.15%
Cadeler A/S
2.15%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.10%
Gentherm, Inc.
2.08%
Archer Aviation, Inc.
1.99%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
1.97%
Lifezone Metals Ltd.
1.88%
Preformed Line Products Co.
1.86%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
1.85%
MP Materials Corp.
1.78%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
1.72%
REX American Resources Corp.
1.70%
NUKZ
Cameco Corp.
8.90%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
3.88%
Endesa SA
3.74%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.69%
CEZ as
3.66%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.46%
Dominion Energy, Inc.
3.21%
Fortum Oyj
3.02%
Emerson Electric Co.
2.93%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
2.93%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.80%
Talen Energy Corp.
2.79%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.79%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.78%
Vistra Corp.
2.63%
Frequently asked questions about PBW and NUKZ
How have the PBW and NUKZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, PBW is down -18.46% year-to-date (YTD), while NUKZ has lost -10.43%. That puts NUKZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBW or NUKZ?
Year-to-date, the PBW ETF saw -$324M in flows, compared to -$22M for NUKZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBW or NUKZ?
Over the past year, PBW had a volatility of 42.12%, while NUKZ experienced 27.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBW or NUKZ?
As of October 23, 2026, PBW holds $283.99 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUKZ manages $622.73 M.
What sectors do the PBW and NUKZ ETFs invest in?
PBW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, NUKZ focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the PBW ETF and NUKZ ETF?
PBW top holdings include BETA Technologies, Inc., OPAL Fuels, Inc. and Itron, Inc.. NUKZ holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc and Endesa SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBW or NUKZ?
PBW holds 71 securities with 30.12% of its assets in the top 15. NUKZ has 46 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.21%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PBW & NUKZ
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
PBW
Range ETFs Debuts New Lineup of 4 Thematic Energy ETFs on NYSE ARCA
February 6, 2024
NUKZ
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
PBW
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
PBW
Advertisement
Advertisement
