PBWvsACESETF Comparison
VS
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. PBW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, ACES's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. PBW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.55% for ACES. PBW is up 4.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$308M in YTD flows. ACES performs worse with -5.68% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBW and ACES below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PBW vs ACES performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBW ACES | -16.18%-12.59% | -14.27%-14.14% | +4.17%-5.68% | +30.14%+7.72% | -20.53%-35.06% | -56.10%-54.03% |
| Flows | PBW ACES | -$49M-$2M | +$16M+$2M | -$308M+$10M | -$94M+$8M | -$159M-$217M | -$438M-$322M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBW ACES | +50.57%+38.74% | +42.91%+34.70% | +41.17%+34.78% | +43.29%+36.51% |
| Max drawdown | PBW ACES | -32.26%-28.59% | -32.26%-28.59% | -67.97%-57.37% | -84.50%-74.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBW ACES | 52d52d | 52d52d | 1012d1096d | 1719d1726d |
Trading data
PBW | ACES | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.66 | $30.56 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $33.22 | $31.62 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PBW | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PBW | ACES | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.66 | $30.56 |
| 1D performance | -4.70% | -3.35% |
| AuM | $379.34 M | $109.47 M |
| E/R | 0.64% | 0.55% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PBW
USA
80.33%
Other
19.67%
ACES
USA
85.31%
Canada
9.61%
Other
5.09%
Sectors
PBW
Industrials
48.7%
Non-Energy Materi.
20.84%
Technology
13.52%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.97%
Other
8.97%
ACES
Industrials
36.16%
Utilities
26.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.11%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.26%
Other
15.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.83%
ACES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.02%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
PBW
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
4.57%
Hyliion Holdings Corp.
2.98%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp.
2.41%
MYR Group, Inc.
2.23%
Bloom Energy Corp.
2.23%
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
2.21%
Powell Industries, Inc.
1.92%
IonQ, Inc.
1.85%
Preformed Line Products Co.
1.85%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
1.84%
Bel Fuse, Inc.
1.81%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
1.80%
ioneer Ltd.
1.80%
D-Wave Quantum, Inc.
1.73%
First Solar, Inc.
1.61%
ACES
Tesla, Inc.
5.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.69%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
5.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
5.10%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.86%
Northland Power, Inc.
4.85%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.71%
Albemarle Corp.
4.66%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
4.61%
First Solar, Inc.
4.53%
Itron, Inc.
4.45%
Plug Power, Inc.
4.43%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
4.18%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.65%
Boralex, Inc.
3.13%
Frequently asked questions about PBW and ACES
How have the PBW and ACES ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, PBW is up 4.17% year-to-date (YTD), while ACES has lost -5.68%. That puts PBW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBW or ACES?
Year-to-date, the PBW ETF saw -$308M in flows, compared to +$10M for ACES.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBW or ACES?
Over the past year, PBW had a volatility of 42.91%, while ACES experienced 34.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBW or ACES?
As of July 24, 2026, PBW holds $379.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACES manages $109.47 M.
What sectors do the PBW and ACES ETFs invest in?
PBW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, ACES focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals.
What are the top holdings of the PBW ETF and ACES ETF?
PBW top holdings include FuelCell Energy, Inc., Hyliion Holdings Corp. and Navitas Semiconductor Corp.. ACES holds in its top three: Tesla, Inc., Rivian Automotive, Inc. and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PBW or ACES?
PBW holds 68 securities with 32.83% of its assets in the top 15. ACES has 38 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.02%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PBW & ACES
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
PBW
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
PBW
ACES
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
PBW
Advertisement
Advertisement
