Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PBUSvsONOFETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is part of the segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PBUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.39% for ONOF. PBUS is down -1% year-to-date (YTD) with -$261M in YTD flows. ONOF performs worse with -1.03% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBUS and ONOF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBUS vs ONOF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBUS ONOF | -2.27%-2.19% | -1.82%-1.88% | -1.00%-1.03% | +22.93%+13.72% | +83.37%+46.26% | +80.48%+54.21% |
| Flows | PBUS ONOF | +$83M+$3M | +$118M+$4M | -$261M+$2M | +$3.11B+$5M | +$5.28B+$39M | +$6.75B+$52M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBUS ONOF | +11.68%+11.78% | +18.35%+17.22% | +14.95%+14.17% | +17.03%+14.45% |
| Max drawdown | PBUS ONOF | -3.47%-3.48% | -13.92%-13.77% | -19.13%-21.66% | -25.42%-25.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBUS ONOF | 43d58d | 45d89d | 126d205d | 715d756d |
PBUS | ONOF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:29 PM | $66.98 | $37.19 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $67.77 | $37.20 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBUS | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBUS | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $66.98 | $37.19 |
| 1D performance | -1.17% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $10.23 B | $142.50 M |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.39% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PBUS and ONOF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PBUS is down -1% year-to-date (YTD), while ONOF has lost -1.03%. That puts PBUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBUS or ONOF?
Year-to-date, the PBUS ETF saw -$261M in flows, compared to +$2M for ONOF.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBUS or ONOF?
Over the past year, PBUS had a volatility of 18.35%, while ONOF experienced 17.22%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBUS or ONOF?
As of March 11, 2026, PBUS holds $10.23 B in assets under management (AUM), while ONOF manages $142.50 M.
What sectors do the PBUS and ONOF ETFs invest in?
PBUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, ONOF focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PBUS ETF and ONOF ETF?
PBUS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. ONOF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBUS or ONOF?
PBUS holds 544 securities with 42.43% of its assets in the top 15. ONOF has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.08%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
